If a debate, the German regions of raison d'etat reached, things can go very fast. With some delay - the numbers have been known for a long time - has got around that drive right-wing German countries all over the world on Internet Save up to abuse. Source: BBC News has
contrast, Jörg-Olaf Schäfers of netzpolitik.org that statistics are only as good as they are presented, since Mr. Clauss apparently exactly the figures support that jugendschutz.net of published . There is talk of such sites in 1707 with right background, with the note "more than ever before." One should know this, that right-wing speech is prohibited as strict as anywhere in Germany. In the U.S., this is even completely legal and there are also the most online sites, which is not mentioned whether the researched figure refers to the German-speaking countries or the entire web. The latter would qualify the clear and inevitable thing in regard to the fact that the Internet is growing, not shrinking, seem logical, if not encouraging. By the way, the world population grows in a now threatening degree and when, once again spreads a rampage at a school headlines, of course, play too many nerds killer games and are to blame ...
The brown propaganda in this country that is just so hastily available, as they would on the Internet computer the neighbor next door.
Here Ulrich Clauss revealed his ignorance of IT technology. If you have never told him that local network technology are by no means relevant distances and the values adjacent to already have some know-how must be able to provide on their PC retrievable data. It should already be a web server or FTP server so that you the usual colorful Internet environment can be experienced via a browser. Of course, neighbor has also its own domain which is of course resolved via DNS on the Internet. Certainly feasible, but by no means "so hastily" as with service providers, even far away from the computer of Mr. Clauss. But that is another issue, a technical ...
In the land of punishable Auschwitz lie that is now calling those on the scene, who knew so far do not quite know how to deal with the network and especially its fans is . Among them are many who are eyeing suspicious for a long time as' free indeed "appearing cyberspace, but so far not with Ursula von der Leyen's strange defense method on child pornography wanted to do something.
Wen Mr. Clauss said that now is left to the imagination of his readers. Will be meant to party rebels in the SPD and the FDP, or an undefined intersection of the Green Party?
It is beyond the here available space to explain why, in the wake of the German Bundestag passed a law to block child pornography sites, a consensus for action against other - no less creepy - content but was not achievable.
Here Mr. Clauss proposes a bridge that has never existed and, according to government never will, at least up to 4 hours after the adoption of the access difficulty Law.
any event, the debate should continue to gain momentum, now, when it comes to the "consensus of all Democrats - is - the defense of any Nazi filth. Very difficult it will now have those who reject questionable procedure with reference to the power locks than "censorship".
Obviously Mr. Clauss believe that if the power locks are already unfit for combat child pornography, but one could alternatively apply it to Nazi propaganda? Censorship continues to refuse, even if Mr. Clauss no alternative knows and believes that this is the last word ...
It is one of the historically developed peculiarities of this country, that consensus is set to intervene against right always to be on their feet rather than one against child pornography. Hopefully this time the constitution to all the tricks - and not just single key topic.
the statement is presumptuous and even gives the impression that the German right-wing's worst nightmare. That might apply to him personally, but abuse victims and their parents, I confess quite another primary enemy to. Also for unaffected, which I count, hopefully, other factors will apply for the assessment?
The following movie review is then fit to the overall discussion, which has now removed much of the fight against child pornography, used the Internet as a bottomless evil criminal swamp:
http://www.youtube .com / watch? v = K_6QOQvBZ5E & feature = player_embedded
"The biggest crime scene in the world" for Rainer Wendt, to demand the head of the police union, the Internet and takes this opportunity to 2,000 new positions. "Cyber Cops", it should be, regardless of the suspicion to go on the internet patrol to investigate crimes.
How can you imagine that now? In large offices in 2000 officials sit in front of the screen and browse the web to track virtual illegal parking? The idea is not absurd to accept as one should, because in the video as an example, a Web site used cheaters. That can now align welcome in this particular case, a Cybercop little, apparently without much relevance. Subscription sites on the Internet are not new and the customer is actually glued largely protected by existing laws. You do not usually respond to demands for payment once their goal is merely a refined threatening gesture, but on very shaky legal leg is ...
out more here: http://www.ayin.at/firewall/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=418
Now I switch to the off-conscious world, and I consider the so-called coffee trips . The comparison should be justified because the methodology is similar. In both cases one could speak of confidence trick, but what about the police patrol in the offline world? Trips disguised as a coffee sales events with price promise there is not just since last week, but where is the demand for more police presence on coffee runs?
And come back the right-wing Internet sites into the game, the existence for more media literacy required to teenagers can protect themselves. In the video review itself is already pointed out that this Cybercops also not sufficient. What do we need this now Cybercops at all?
It is remarkable how the argument dissolves for more human resources in the form of work-related Internet surfing even if the statements in the video report only long enough to think ...
But the biggest crime scene in the world, the Internet, as it would have us believe lobbyists and politicians, there are certainly other criminal acts?
are not many people with fake bank sites to substantial sums of money robbed? In technical language we speak of phishing . In fact, this corresponds to the truth, but requires a lot of ignorance of those concerned with the use of emails and websites, and a certain naivete in dealing with their personal data. In the offline world, there are also counterparts do. Manipulation of ATMs up to the lapidary pickpocket is no less lucrative. Where is the police presence, here is helpful to the victims to the side? There is demand for it is not, but on the Internet to 2000 Cybercops prevent phishing? How are they to do that ...?
One could turn this turn around times!
The financial crisis was neither the Internet nor the internet triggered. Greedy bankers and investment managers have driven entire industries out of business. Government and citizens have to bear the debt burden and responsibility, while by now it was revealed that the perpetrators continue long since her wicked doings under the eyes of the legislature. Where are the voices that call for censorship in the financial world?
I recently saw a report on Panorama , where the government approved the managers, despite government subsidies million dollar bonuses and salaries that were previously criticized media coverage of the same people. Where in the offline world, the call is for regulation?
embarrassing the reputation of politicians and lobbying for better control of the Internet, if you look at the scandal look at the Puma armored . Would it not make more sense and provide more appropriate to our political decision-makers under better control before you want to censor the Internet? Somehow it seems to me that wanted to deflect as the politicians and their lobbyists of himself ... That had
Ursula von der Leyen, recently used in Sulzbach (Saar), a propaganda event of the local CDU local associations for their hypocritical fight against child pornography, one could have imagined. Although I request the concerned operators the opportunity to put questions to Ms von der Leyen put this matter to be able to consent had heard this was possible in the course of the event at any stage. Democracy is what claims the demagogue Ursula von der Leyen for himself.
A detailed analysis will save me, they exist already: reasoning test
Update: The original report of the author Jan aka Urpils:
So - after my Fortunately, the video has spread so nicely, here are my impressions from the evening of "Zensursulavideos"
I could not understand quite why exactly in our small town Mrs von der Leyen for the election had to be there or wanted to - but the opportunity to ask her in person a few questions and experience the following reactions, and could miss I would not. Therefore, I thought, from a longer request, in which I first wanted to thank her for that she had managed to send such a large amount of previously politically less active people in the Pirate Party and other organizations to FINALLY against tackle the constant monitoring and restriction madness of the current government. Furthermore, it was clear that it is superior to me entirely rhetorically, why I did not want to be limited to technical detail. Rather, I intended to tell her that I think intelligent enough for her to know the impact of Internet blocking really have, and how she could reconcile it with their conscience, to have opened Pandora's box. During her speech I was very - very - soon realized that this question had done ... The sharpness and falsity of their speech, it was simply impossible for me to send even a positive word to them - even if it was ironic. After a journey of family policy, the financial crisis and highlighting various "feats" of the CDU garnered thunderous applause, began their - well known - Speak to the Internet Lock. That was one of those moments that I will never forget. In the faces of those present, I read only the approval, acceptance and joy of the minister, while crossed my mind more a matter that I felt myself in the wrong movie ...
me goose bumps ran down my spine, as the room began to applaud - I felt in a documentary video moved that the hearing people shows in front of a rushing and insane dictator. Maybe you know this feeling of historical documentaries that the incredible euphoria and consent, which did not receive such dangerous people may take ... Even worse is when you really in the middle and you can see no saving anchor, not a spark of questioning or doubt in the audience cheering. At that time I was angry, frustrated disappointed, shocked ...
Shortly after her speech, she vanished from the stage and was not adopted by thanking a local politician. And I thought it simply no longer and pulled half despair, half in anger with his hands in the air and called to make to my attention that I wanted to say something, but this was ignored professionally, while 3 security men, our beloved family minister to their dark official car accompanied. At the output of the local television and was waiting for a "what a great and friendly woman" by one of the guests, which is why the frustration gripped me AGAIN and I have given a dissenting vote. However, as I was pretty horrified by this speech and could hardly think clearly, was of course out of anything meaningful - I would have even considered crazy, if I had seen on television) ('m not a skilled politician with meaning nothing can testify). any event, the press mentioned the next day with no word that it was just not exclusively positive reactions ...
I therefore urge everyone who recognizes that we are on a dangerous path are that he give in his circle of awareness of the current events that educate about issues such as data retention, internet lock, electronic health card, etc. and so many critically thinking people active as possible, so we take our concerns into the policy. The many victims who have fought and suffered for a free life, should not have done for nothing!
explanation of the term "Urpils. It is a certain type of beer, a regional brewery, which in the catchment area is very popular. For Saarland is one such pseudonym is not unusual and could express a certain attachment to the same beer (pure speculation).
repeated mantra-like that woman their campaign of lies - disgusting!
Click here for previous articles: ... because they know (not) do what they are!
0 comments:
Post a Comment