of recent events, the reference to a few days ago launched blog that reports on the demonstrations and events in Iran - because they are represented in the relevant German media has still only shortened.
http://freeirannow.wordpress.com/
Tuesday, June 23, 2009
What Does The Illinois Driver License Look Like
"I want this pub to make a poli'ical statement. A very strong poli'ical statement."
of recent events, the reference to a few days ago launched blog that reports on the demonstrations and events in Iran - because they are represented in the relevant German media has still only shortened.
http://freeirannow.wordpress.com/
of recent events, the reference to a few days ago launched blog that reports on the demonstrations and events in Iran - because they are represented in the relevant German media has still only shortened.
http://freeirannow.wordpress.com/
Thursday, June 18, 2009
Covering Up A Broken Tooth
stupid people are good voters ...
... or such as effective propaganda can be controlled by intentional concealment of important information of the will of the people (Deja Vu?)
will become more
The Federal Government 18.06.2009 has passed a new law, which basically is nothing unusual, but in this case, the understanding of the rule of law fundamentally redefined. What began as amendment of the Telemedia Act to combat child pornography should be established in his name to Access difficulty Law , as it is now considered to be so as an independent law outside of the Telemedia Act.
Just because this law has encountered in its development with considerable criticism from IT and legal experts, a broad consensus of the people is apparently very reassuring, because one is aware of the implications of that company's fully conscious.
Representative polls still seem to be a popular tool to justify their own projects. Are the questions formulated just sent, you can specify the desired outcome in advance.
The play will be staged as follows:
the Ministry of Family, Seniors, Women and Youth through a representative population sample. These were between 29 May and 11 Juni 2009 1832 persons interviewed orally, in person. The results
representative for the German population over 16.
Question 1:
The Federal Government has recently agreed on measures against child pornography, that Internet providers are required to block access to child porn sites. When an Internet user comes to such sites, a large stop sign is displayed, and it does not come anymore. Welcome these measures, or hold it not for the appropriate way to combat child pornography?
The overwhelming survey results confirmed that 91% of respondents welcomed this proposal. Would a different result was expected? Without extensive background information that may in any case most respondents were not available, no one can really expect a much different result. I let the original question, the Institute for Allensbach are completely unchanged so and add add the following information:
alternative has the deletion of child pornography sites and is proven to be classified in its effectiveness demonstrated higher since disappeared blocking or redirect the child porn sites can not, only hidden. A bypass the lock with a few entries already realized by computer amateurs. Hold the stop sign but the most desirable method for measure?
Question 2:
Do you think that the people through these stop signs on the Internet in their right to freedom of information
be restricted too much, or can not find it?
How should someone be able to judge this if it does not explain the background. People who use the Internet anyway, it may seem as if you ask them if they regret that seaweed is not at least once a week is offered in German canteens as a main course. The information required in order to determine the issue in connection with child pornography-issue to be deliberately concealed. I leave the question again in their original version and supplements are so again with information that is essential for the objective evaluation:
An internet surfer who happens to, consciously or unconsciously a stop sign Page in their browser sees is, with its traffic data collected inevitably, as a potential pederast automatically in the prosecution file of the BKA. Although the latter was dismissed by now, does not change the fact that a basic data acquisition is possible. But the BKA to determine which content on the Internet at the stop sign or be diverted while an external committee will randomly check the CRL. As this body is composed, is unknown before the adoption of the law. Evidence from countries that perform those restricted activities have already confirmed that not only the child pornography Have fallen victim to censorship. On the contrary, child pornography were proportionally represented in the single digits. Represent you for this finding, the opinion that the right to freedom of information to be very limited or not?
found 90% of respondents without this additional information that the right to freedom of information would not be very limited ...
Question 3:
entertain Here are two about whether the blocking of Internet sites with child pornography is the right way to combat child pornography. Which (r) of two says rather what you think?
opinion 1:
"Although I am of the opinion that child pornography must be fought, but the blocking of Internet sites go too far. It can not be that the state determines what the individual may look at the web and what not. In this way the freedom of citizens
is limited to very "
opinion 2:
. I see things differently. Freedom of information has its limits, and when it comes to child pornography, this limit is exceeded. Therefore, access to Internet sites are blocked with the content. "
is sent to the think a embedded in an underlying negative statement which suggests inconspicuous: "You can look at what you want, including child pornography"
course, one should not consciously look at child pornography (may) , which was also already sufficiently regulated by law. Someone who does not have pedophilic disposition is, do not consciously anyway. As is proved that the stop sign so the content does not eliminate from the Internet and a bypass is relatively easy, you can delete this question if the deletion of this content would have been followed consistently ...
By the way, joined in 90% of respondents believe 2 and I do without this time on an informative complement to the question, since a tiny aspect was removed from a complex topic and the meaning distorted ...
Question 4: Do
you that with these measures success and can reduce the use of child pornography on the Internet, or do you think that those who want to see something related, still a way to get hold of these pages?
A question with the phrase "Believe ..." begins can hardly expect more than estimates. The gut feeling of people with completely different level of knowledge is to bring a representative result? After all, "believe" 62% of respondents said that those who intend to continue to be achieved. As a reasonably critical survey participants, with or without the relevant background information, I would have expressed the following as a counter-question: "Is there no more promising measures?"
Question 5:
entertain Here are two about whether the blocking of Internet sites with child pornography is the right way to combat child pornography. Which (r) of two says rather what you think?
opinion 1:
"I do not think it will help to block access to websites with child pornography. Who searches the Internet child porn,
will they find, no matter how many sites are blocked. Therefore, such a blockade is necessary, "
opinion 2:
. I see things differently. Even if you stay with such a blockade, not all may be deterred from it but many users. I therefore believe that such a lock on
absolutely necessary. "
The question has already been wrong. What users are held up because of the blockade or which user wants to stop it? Federal Family Minister Ursula von der Leyen has also developed a very unique proposition: She thinks that opportunity Surfer "hooked" by the use of child pornography. She believes that pedophilia can be compared with drug or alcohol addiction. She is also the view that people will develop low-pedophile assessment by relevant offers unlimited Internet in an increased demand. I can tell this is not and therefore do not go further on the matter. However, I doubt that people run without this disposition, by the random calls of child porn sites, the risk of being a pedophile. Furthermore, I also doubt that without Intent on child pornography comes when you do not explicitly receive a link under false pretense, or already have a surfing behavior that is located in the nearby environment.
represented 82% of respondents believe 2. In this I see no contradiction, however, scares me a child pornography site clearly from more than a stop sign. The 1 Case would cause a shock effect which would cause me to act on the cancellation of this website and the punishment of the perpetrators down. In the 2nd Case, I would take the stop sign just read and ask me why the website has been surfing on the block list ...
... and here begins a new chapter
Why is the requested website on the block list of the BKA?
Is she landed wrong about that?
Or has identified the BKA child pornography, but was not able to obtain a cancellation?
Why could not delete a page with a proven child pornography, so the second Instance (the blockade) was applied?
wooden eye be watchful!
Click here for previous articles: of imbecility fat booty
... or such as effective propaganda can be controlled by intentional concealment of important information of the will of the people (Deja Vu?)
will become more
The Federal Government 18.06.2009 has passed a new law, which basically is nothing unusual, but in this case, the understanding of the rule of law fundamentally redefined. What began as amendment of the Telemedia Act to combat child pornography should be established in his name to Access difficulty Law , as it is now considered to be so as an independent law outside of the Telemedia Act.
Just because this law has encountered in its development with considerable criticism from IT and legal experts, a broad consensus of the people is apparently very reassuring, because one is aware of the implications of that company's fully conscious.
Representative polls still seem to be a popular tool to justify their own projects. Are the questions formulated just sent, you can specify the desired outcome in advance.
The play will be staged as follows:
the Ministry of Family, Seniors, Women and Youth through a representative population sample. These were between 29 May and 11 Juni 2009 1832 persons interviewed orally, in person. The results
representative for the German population over 16.
Question 1:
The Federal Government has recently agreed on measures against child pornography, that Internet providers are required to block access to child porn sites. When an Internet user comes to such sites, a large stop sign is displayed, and it does not come anymore. Welcome these measures, or hold it not for the appropriate way to combat child pornography?
The overwhelming survey results confirmed that 91% of respondents welcomed this proposal. Would a different result was expected? Without extensive background information that may in any case most respondents were not available, no one can really expect a much different result. I let the original question, the Institute for Allensbach are completely unchanged so and add add the following information:
alternative has the deletion of child pornography sites and is proven to be classified in its effectiveness demonstrated higher since disappeared blocking or redirect the child porn sites can not, only hidden. A bypass the lock with a few entries already realized by computer amateurs. Hold the stop sign but the most desirable method for measure?
Question 2:
Do you think that the people through these stop signs on the Internet in their right to freedom of information
be restricted too much, or can not find it?
How should someone be able to judge this if it does not explain the background. People who use the Internet anyway, it may seem as if you ask them if they regret that seaweed is not at least once a week is offered in German canteens as a main course. The information required in order to determine the issue in connection with child pornography-issue to be deliberately concealed. I leave the question again in their original version and supplements are so again with information that is essential for the objective evaluation:
An internet surfer who happens to, consciously or unconsciously a stop sign Page in their browser sees is, with its traffic data collected inevitably, as a potential pederast automatically in the prosecution file of the BKA. Although the latter was dismissed by now, does not change the fact that a basic data acquisition is possible. But the BKA to determine which content on the Internet at the stop sign or be diverted while an external committee will randomly check the CRL. As this body is composed, is unknown before the adoption of the law. Evidence from countries that perform those restricted activities have already confirmed that not only the child pornography Have fallen victim to censorship. On the contrary, child pornography were proportionally represented in the single digits. Represent you for this finding, the opinion that the right to freedom of information to be very limited or not?
found 90% of respondents without this additional information that the right to freedom of information would not be very limited ...
Question 3:
entertain Here are two about whether the blocking of Internet sites with child pornography is the right way to combat child pornography. Which (r) of two says rather what you think?
opinion 1:
"Although I am of the opinion that child pornography must be fought, but the blocking of Internet sites go too far. It can not be that the state determines what the individual may look at the web and what not. In this way the freedom of citizens
is limited to very "
opinion 2:
. I see things differently. Freedom of information has its limits, and when it comes to child pornography, this limit is exceeded. Therefore, access to Internet sites are blocked with the content. "
is sent to the think a embedded in an underlying negative statement which suggests inconspicuous: "You can look at what you want, including child pornography"
course, one should not consciously look at child pornography (may) , which was also already sufficiently regulated by law. Someone who does not have pedophilic disposition is, do not consciously anyway. As is proved that the stop sign so the content does not eliminate from the Internet and a bypass is relatively easy, you can delete this question if the deletion of this content would have been followed consistently ...
By the way, joined in 90% of respondents believe 2 and I do without this time on an informative complement to the question, since a tiny aspect was removed from a complex topic and the meaning distorted ...
Question 4: Do
you that with these measures success and can reduce the use of child pornography on the Internet, or do you think that those who want to see something related, still a way to get hold of these pages?
A question with the phrase "Believe ..." begins can hardly expect more than estimates. The gut feeling of people with completely different level of knowledge is to bring a representative result? After all, "believe" 62% of respondents said that those who intend to continue to be achieved. As a reasonably critical survey participants, with or without the relevant background information, I would have expressed the following as a counter-question: "Is there no more promising measures?"
Question 5:
entertain Here are two about whether the blocking of Internet sites with child pornography is the right way to combat child pornography. Which (r) of two says rather what you think?
opinion 1:
"I do not think it will help to block access to websites with child pornography. Who searches the Internet child porn,
will they find, no matter how many sites are blocked. Therefore, such a blockade is necessary, "
opinion 2:
. I see things differently. Even if you stay with such a blockade, not all may be deterred from it but many users. I therefore believe that such a lock on
absolutely necessary. "
The question has already been wrong. What users are held up because of the blockade or which user wants to stop it? Federal Family Minister Ursula von der Leyen has also developed a very unique proposition: She thinks that opportunity Surfer "hooked" by the use of child pornography. She believes that pedophilia can be compared with drug or alcohol addiction. She is also the view that people will develop low-pedophile assessment by relevant offers unlimited Internet in an increased demand. I can tell this is not and therefore do not go further on the matter. However, I doubt that people run without this disposition, by the random calls of child porn sites, the risk of being a pedophile. Furthermore, I also doubt that without Intent on child pornography comes when you do not explicitly receive a link under false pretense, or already have a surfing behavior that is located in the nearby environment.
represented 82% of respondents believe 2. In this I see no contradiction, however, scares me a child pornography site clearly from more than a stop sign. The 1 Case would cause a shock effect which would cause me to act on the cancellation of this website and the punishment of the perpetrators down. In the 2nd Case, I would take the stop sign just read and ask me why the website has been surfing on the block list ...
... and here begins a new chapter
Why is the requested website on the block list of the BKA?
Is she landed wrong about that?
Or has identified the BKA child pornography, but was not able to obtain a cancellation?
Why could not delete a page with a proven child pornography, so the second Instance (the blockade) was applied?
wooden eye be watchful!
Click here for previous articles: of imbecility fat booty
Tuesday, June 16, 2009
Things To Use Instead Of Rizlas
of imbecility fat booty
Had something thought possible? The federal government passed a law that requires no justification fatally. Here is the speech by the change of the Telemedia Act as regards the fight against child pornography. What would at first when in fact all people find a favorable agreement, turns out on closer inspection as gaffe with unforeseeable consequences. Pure activism coupled with calculated populism open entry into the state censorship. What had happened?
Federal Family Minister Ursula von der Leyen has appointed Jeanne d'Arc the German political elite would like to banish and on behalf of all abused children disgusting child pornography images from his abysmal evil web. May Video News Release by Ursula von der Leyen
you give to an elected People's Representative full faith unless it is: Despite the technical shortcomings that represents the used techniques of
DNS Access Blocking
, the arguments of the Minister are first to understand would justify their plans public? Doubt should be allowed and who will in some way critical of arguments questioning, is indeed not the same as a pederast.
The minister talks openly by millions of business and mass market on the Internet.
In the so-called "Little request" of the FDP deputies Christoph Waitz and Hans-Joachim Otto replies the State Secretary Dr. Bernd Pfaffenbach ...
Q17 based on the data base, the federal government in assessing the commercial market for child pornography in Germany?
Answer: The federal government has no detailed assessment of the commercial market for child pornography in Germany.
Similarly, the politician as happy on the success in other countries with the block list, juggle with numbers of alleged access to child pornography and the huge percentage increase in crime in child pornography range:
Question 3: In which countries are the child pornography content on the Internet and where are the servers on which there is child pornography?
Answer: websites with under German law as a child-pornographic content, according to findings of the BKA einzustufeneden almost exclusively on servers abroad provided and there preferably in countries with low level of control, or where no such legislation exists, or the corresponding regulations are not strictly enforced and monitored ...
And where are the servers in practice? This is obviously not white and gives way to a clear answer from spur of the moment ...
But obviously we know that is not in different countries of child pornography criminally prosecuted adequately. Therefore urges the following question:
Question 4: In which countries is child pornography yet not a criminal offense?
Answer: are given by the Federal Government no confirmed knowledge of the purposes of comparative law studies. Some (tentative) conclusions can be drawn ... ...
Question 6: How many servers that are child pornography, are in countries where child pornography is not a criminal offense?
Answer: As shown in the answer to question 4, has the federal government does not have comparative studies on the criminalization of child pornography in other countries. It has therefore no information on server sites in such countries.
The draft amendment is among others to justify the following (which is cited time and again like Mrs von der Leyen):
the police recorded crime statistics for years a constant increase in the ownership, acquisition and dissemination of child pornography (2007: 11 357 cases; to increase by 55% compared with 2006: 7318 cases). When the collateral of child pornography over the Internet from 2006 to 2007, even an increase of 111% was observed (from 2936 to 6206 cases).
Interestingly, just confirmed by Interior Minister Wolfgang Schäuble recently published crime statistics 2008, a contrary development. Also suppresses Dr. von der Leyen in its argument that the above figures relate to all scheduled ads, crime and the prosecution, but was stopped most of the procedures. In addition to these statistics also flow results from a large-scale, unique investigations. The figures put forward by the Minister therefore, are partly unrealistic and sometimes pure speculation.
Considering the success of, for example, the Scandinavian countries with their blocking lists, so spreads themselves from disillusionment. It is spoken by about 1% real child pornography websites blocked, the rest is either not criminal pornography, long since deleted web sites and, unfortunately, a lot of websites with completely different content.
It is surprising why the government still holds to its plans to curb child pornography with a completely absurd resources from the Internet. That the method of DNA Access Blocking can be avoided in any case by most Internet users easily, I should mention at all any more.
I firmly believe that after using all possible constitutional measures the deletion of child pornography on the Internet would be effective enough that the blacklist of the BKA, without writing very small, found on a beer cap space would. Consistent action against child pornography is blocking lists, which can be used as censorship, unnecessary ...
Important links:
direct request to the Federal Family Minister Ursula von der Leyen
(A voting system can accelerate the personal reply from the Minister may ...)
The fake interviews with various members
(public statements of Representatives shall be in the form of an interview commented sarcastically ...)
Click here for previous articles: driver's license, bank accounts and child pornography
Had something thought possible? The federal government passed a law that requires no justification fatally. Here is the speech by the change of the Telemedia Act as regards the fight against child pornography. What would at first when in fact all people find a favorable agreement, turns out on closer inspection as gaffe with unforeseeable consequences. Pure activism coupled with calculated populism open entry into the state censorship. What had happened?
Federal Family Minister Ursula von der Leyen has appointed Jeanne d'Arc the German political elite would like to banish and on behalf of all abused children disgusting child pornography images from his abysmal evil web. May Video News Release by Ursula von der Leyen
you give to an elected People's Representative full faith unless it is: Despite the technical shortcomings that represents the used techniques of
DNS Access Blocking
, the arguments of the Minister are first to understand would justify their plans public? Doubt should be allowed and who will in some way critical of arguments questioning, is indeed not the same as a pederast.
The minister talks openly by millions of business and mass market on the Internet.
In the so-called "Little request" of the FDP deputies Christoph Waitz and Hans-Joachim Otto replies the State Secretary Dr. Bernd Pfaffenbach ...
Q17 based on the data base, the federal government in assessing the commercial market for child pornography in Germany?
Answer: The federal government has no detailed assessment of the commercial market for child pornography in Germany.
Similarly, the politician as happy on the success in other countries with the block list, juggle with numbers of alleged access to child pornography and the huge percentage increase in crime in child pornography range:
Question 3: In which countries are the child pornography content on the Internet and where are the servers on which there is child pornography?
Answer: websites with under German law as a child-pornographic content, according to findings of the BKA einzustufeneden almost exclusively on servers abroad provided and there preferably in countries with low level of control, or where no such legislation exists, or the corresponding regulations are not strictly enforced and monitored ...
And where are the servers in practice? This is obviously not white and gives way to a clear answer from spur of the moment ...
But obviously we know that is not in different countries of child pornography criminally prosecuted adequately. Therefore urges the following question:
Question 4: In which countries is child pornography yet not a criminal offense?
Answer: are given by the Federal Government no confirmed knowledge of the purposes of comparative law studies. Some (tentative) conclusions can be drawn ... ...
Question 6: How many servers that are child pornography, are in countries where child pornography is not a criminal offense?
Answer: As shown in the answer to question 4, has the federal government does not have comparative studies on the criminalization of child pornography in other countries. It has therefore no information on server sites in such countries.
The draft amendment is among others to justify the following (which is cited time and again like Mrs von der Leyen):
the police recorded crime statistics for years a constant increase in the ownership, acquisition and dissemination of child pornography (2007: 11 357 cases; to increase by 55% compared with 2006: 7318 cases). When the collateral of child pornography over the Internet from 2006 to 2007, even an increase of 111% was observed (from 2936 to 6206 cases).
Interestingly, just confirmed by Interior Minister Wolfgang Schäuble recently published crime statistics 2008, a contrary development. Also suppresses Dr. von der Leyen in its argument that the above figures relate to all scheduled ads, crime and the prosecution, but was stopped most of the procedures. In addition to these statistics also flow results from a large-scale, unique investigations. The figures put forward by the Minister therefore, are partly unrealistic and sometimes pure speculation.
Considering the success of, for example, the Scandinavian countries with their blocking lists, so spreads themselves from disillusionment. It is spoken by about 1% real child pornography websites blocked, the rest is either not criminal pornography, long since deleted web sites and, unfortunately, a lot of websites with completely different content.
It is surprising why the government still holds to its plans to curb child pornography with a completely absurd resources from the Internet. That the method of DNA Access Blocking can be avoided in any case by most Internet users easily, I should mention at all any more.
I firmly believe that after using all possible constitutional measures the deletion of child pornography on the Internet would be effective enough that the blacklist of the BKA, without writing very small, found on a beer cap space would. Consistent action against child pornography is blocking lists, which can be used as censorship, unnecessary ...
Important links:
direct request to the Federal Family Minister Ursula von der Leyen
(A voting system can accelerate the personal reply from the Minister may ...)
The fake interviews with various members
(public statements of Representatives shall be in the form of an interview commented sarcastically ...)
Click here for previous articles: driver's license, bank accounts and child pornography
Wednesday, June 3, 2009
Bulsa Wood Bridge Designs
license, bank accounts and child pornography
Family Minister Ursula von der Leyen, ridiculed on the net now as Zensursula would like to receive all the concerns impose from experts from business, law and IT its controversial amendment of the Teleservices Act. Internet surfers the opportunity to lock deter access child pornographic content on the WWW can. These so-called stop-plate sites realized technically DNS Blocking Access ( The domain name of the website is not directed to actual corresponding IP address of the Web server, but on another, so that the call of this website is inhibited ) therefore constitute a barrier and also a warning dar. This obstacle is hardly effective as the unlawful entry of a public lawn, which is characterized by an appropriate sign as a restricted zone. The warning, unfortunately, is much more than a sign can be read on the "Beware of Dog!" Who discovered the stop sign on his screen, is at the same time the BKA as a potential pederast in a list. Comparatively could say it was already bitten by the dog while you are still looking at the warning sign. These interactions are treated in the above link to the forum in some detail and chronologically ... In order to obtain a license
for a motor vehicle, you need some money, in principle, the majority, demonstrated sufficient theoretical and practical training sessions and a final exam. In parallel, it takes a lot of bureaucracy, which ensures that the document is "driving" transferred to certain fixed rules in a verifiable database, where authorities gain any time on-demand access. It does eventually "Everything" have his order ...
Who has no checking or savings account with one or more banks? By default, belong to an account and corresponding credit cards and a variety of services. That one can enter into such a relationship not only with a vigorous handshake seems to be completely natural in our society. I could not tell off the cuff, are cast as many signatures on different forms and diversity that is demanded of personal data. It almost borders on a miracle, that is not the hamster or the canary in particular must be mentioned anywhere yet ...
What now has the license or do the bank account of the proposed amendment of the Telemedia Act to better combat child pornography? Comparatively little, but as a comparison, in principle, but a lot.
Although the arguments, child pornography would have been an explosion spread through the Internet, the commercial market for it would be a lucrative business and the WWW would provide the main hub, have been refuted largely are, let's take it anyway, so be it, as described by the lobbyists claim. How can it be because it can be as easy to offer child pornography on a homepage on the Internet? Since only the blocking of Internet Zensursula and only a domain name can block, is obvious to assume that this type of delivery and consumption that means. Everything else is completely unfounded and would require completely different technical measures.
How will we now the happy owner of such a site? Some providers offer the same in the contract for Internet access as an additional service a so-called domain. In Germany, the Denic responsible for assigning and registering a UK domain. The Denic describes itself as a cooperative and its members are companies that manage the respective customer's domains. In most cases, there are so-called providers, private companies, the applicable laws of the State subject in which they are listed as a company. All companies have generally called "Terms". Here I quote from the times of the terms and Denic 3.2:
ensures the customer that the content is not against the law. In addition, the deposit of pornographic, extremist or not opposed to the decency content through the ICO web services allowed. ICO is entitled to the aforementioned content immediately without further notice and delete them. Does a customer or substantially despite warnings against these conditions, ICO is entitled to the contract terminate for good cause.
As you can easily find, there's also the Internet laws are observed and the terms and conditions are drafted accordingly thereafter. It is totally unreasonable in relation to the Internet from outside of the law to talk. Due to the law, it is really surprising that on servers, especially to the homepages according to the Government as much child pornographic material may be stored under conditions that are hidden from the eyes of Internet users surfing needs. Is it not a duty and task that the provider shall ensure that the terms are complied with, since they are also would make even the criminalization? It is therefore not surprising that references to child pornography will be followed up very promptly and efficiently by the providers. Internet censorship are totally unnecessary ...
likes to call the government's argument that access is not on child pornography in countries without effective laws against child pornography would be easy. This argument is ridiculous. Which country in the world would be like to blame this negative image? Such actions by various organizations have found that to be taken outside of Germany, such questions very seriously and to address it. It should be Mention that the majority of child pornography or, if there really are some who are "hosted" on servers that are in countries whose laws apply the necessary sharpness. Instead of whole departments sift through the BKA the Internet for child pornography websites, you can set up virtual stop signs by the respective providers and spends the rest of the time to managing and testing the derived lists, could these people also work specifically that the horrible images will be deleted directly. Putting the focus on the targeted deletion of child pornography on Internet servers, this approach is not as difficult as the government It wants to sell to the voters and people always effective.
Of course, this is child pornography and also of child abuse contained hardly noticeable, so it deals with only a small part of the overall problem. Stupid way (otherwise I can not even express) stigmatized the government that small area of crime against children as a top priority in the fight against global organized "child porn mafia", except in the even exists. Prostitution of children takes place in real life, mostly in countries where the Internet has no meaning for either perpetrator or victim. Child abuse is also behind closed doors in homes in family environment instead of the perpetrators are not interested to draw attention on the Internet for their transgressions. There is no question that there is a pedophile scene, exchanging the corresponding image and video material, but even that barely touches on the WWW. The Internet is mostly used as transport and communication. Internet censorship will be there no solution, we have asked other, more efficient measures that have been shown here and elsewhere so already. Why do the politicians of the Federal Government, led by Federal Minister for Family Affairs Ursula von der Leyen, vehemently so hard on a method that is doomed to failure even before its launch?
Even under the Pretext and the belief that even this small aspect (child pornography on servers in the WWW) of the overall problem "child abuse" is to fight successfully, the method is hardly promising and very efficient.
Looking at an example of the Danish block list, you will find that use most of the domains listed in the top-level domain com . This is awarded by the U.S. company Verisign . VeriSign also runs the same two DNS root servers, so to speak, the top Hirarchiestufe the name resolution on the Internet. Now we've already established that as a U.S. company Verisign is subject to the laws of the United States, which we all know that child pornography is sufficient under law. It is beyond me, but that so many sleazy sites with top-level domain com may be in circulation, but if the legal situation is clarified? Why do some states still have to operate with such block lists?
You should also know that include the domains on the block lists only a fraction of actual child pornography, while the rest is mostly pornography, but it is without children or with extremely young looking actors, a well-intended suggestion. Still other domains have relatively little or nothing to do with pornography, and some exist not even. That says little for the currency and the maintenance of these CRLs will, but at the BKA much work better (?)
Thus, if a contracting authority of top-level domains such as Verisign not clearly complies with the laws of the United States and followed, I have serious doubts the sincerity of the politicians who are advocating to the public for a tough prosecution of child pornography. The web surfer who accidentally gets a stop sign side is put under general suspicion, earning the company, millions of dollars to the award and administration of domain names (including child pornography), are obviously outside the legal system. Here smell something enormous?
climb the ladder a step higher, one comes to the concept ICANN not around. The acronym stands for Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers which means that here determines which IP addresses and domain names which are in circulation. The "foundation" the Commerce Department reports directly to, which means that the U.S. government basically is in charge.
Then there are the former "One Man Show" IANA (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority), a quasi suborganization of ICANN, which delegated the assignment of IP address ranges to various local establishments. Also in this case, the U.S. government has the absolute influence.
one wanted to act effectively against child pornography and useful on the web, as far as the plans of Federal Family Minister Ursula von der Leyen equivalent, would therefore be with the Government of the United States to the right place. You fight child pornography on the Internet at the roots and leaves in the first place, that these domains can arise, the Internet blocking Zensursula seem downright ridiculous. but someone is violating existing laws, these organizations left in the duty to intervene against it. If they do not, they make themselves liable to prosecution. Where your there are difficulties, transnational combat child pornography, one need but in 99% of cases only in the political, economic and military partner to contact or United States relations are on a humanitarian level, much worse?
What do you do now with the percentage of domains that you can not directly lay with existing laws lame? All right to the BKA these domains rely on a restricted list so that you can not reach them, but please, with no stop sign, data collection! This one would not anyway, but this task should not only be taken by the BKA and sovereign. Apart from the blacklist would rather clearly would fail and ultimately unnecessary. Has been adduced sufficient evidence that the Internet and why locks are useless, at least if one wants to aim only to combat child pornography. It would be about time that the proponents of blocking plans to present themselves sound facts. I call on the supporters of stop signs campaign to prove the following:
Present your once a single Internet presence with a proven child pornography, which can not be removed from the web and only DNS Access Blocking left as appropriate countermeasure is!
I'm waiting ... 
Family Minister Ursula von der Leyen, ridiculed on the net now as Zensursula would like to receive all the concerns impose from experts from business, law and IT its controversial amendment of the Teleservices Act. Internet surfers the opportunity to lock deter access child pornographic content on the WWW can. These so-called stop-plate sites realized technically DNS Blocking Access ( The domain name of the website is not directed to actual corresponding IP address of the Web server, but on another, so that the call of this website is inhibited ) therefore constitute a barrier and also a warning dar. This obstacle is hardly effective as the unlawful entry of a public lawn, which is characterized by an appropriate sign as a restricted zone. The warning, unfortunately, is much more than a sign can be read on the "Beware of Dog!" Who discovered the stop sign on his screen, is at the same time the BKA as a potential pederast in a list. Comparatively could say it was already bitten by the dog while you are still looking at the warning sign. These interactions are treated in the above link to the forum in some detail and chronologically ... In order to obtain a license
for a motor vehicle, you need some money, in principle, the majority, demonstrated sufficient theoretical and practical training sessions and a final exam. In parallel, it takes a lot of bureaucracy, which ensures that the document is "driving" transferred to certain fixed rules in a verifiable database, where authorities gain any time on-demand access. It does eventually "Everything" have his order ...
Who has no checking or savings account with one or more banks? By default, belong to an account and corresponding credit cards and a variety of services. That one can enter into such a relationship not only with a vigorous handshake seems to be completely natural in our society. I could not tell off the cuff, are cast as many signatures on different forms and diversity that is demanded of personal data. It almost borders on a miracle, that is not the hamster or the canary in particular must be mentioned anywhere yet ...
What now has the license or do the bank account of the proposed amendment of the Telemedia Act to better combat child pornography? Comparatively little, but as a comparison, in principle, but a lot.
Although the arguments, child pornography would have been an explosion spread through the Internet, the commercial market for it would be a lucrative business and the WWW would provide the main hub, have been refuted largely are, let's take it anyway, so be it, as described by the lobbyists claim. How can it be because it can be as easy to offer child pornography on a homepage on the Internet? Since only the blocking of Internet Zensursula and only a domain name can block, is obvious to assume that this type of delivery and consumption that means. Everything else is completely unfounded and would require completely different technical measures.
How will we now the happy owner of such a site? Some providers offer the same in the contract for Internet access as an additional service a so-called domain. In Germany, the Denic responsible for assigning and registering a UK domain. The Denic describes itself as a cooperative and its members are companies that manage the respective customer's domains. In most cases, there are so-called providers, private companies, the applicable laws of the State subject in which they are listed as a company. All companies have generally called "Terms". Here I quote from the times of the terms and Denic 3.2:
ensures the customer that the content is not against the law. In addition, the deposit of pornographic, extremist or not opposed to the decency content through the ICO web services allowed. ICO is entitled to the aforementioned content immediately without further notice and delete them. Does a customer or substantially despite warnings against these conditions, ICO is entitled to the contract terminate for good cause.
As you can easily find, there's also the Internet laws are observed and the terms and conditions are drafted accordingly thereafter. It is totally unreasonable in relation to the Internet from outside of the law to talk. Due to the law, it is really surprising that on servers, especially to the homepages according to the Government as much child pornographic material may be stored under conditions that are hidden from the eyes of Internet users surfing needs. Is it not a duty and task that the provider shall ensure that the terms are complied with, since they are also would make even the criminalization? It is therefore not surprising that references to child pornography will be followed up very promptly and efficiently by the providers. Internet censorship are totally unnecessary ...
likes to call the government's argument that access is not on child pornography in countries without effective laws against child pornography would be easy. This argument is ridiculous. Which country in the world would be like to blame this negative image? Such actions by various organizations have found that to be taken outside of Germany, such questions very seriously and to address it. It should be Mention that the majority of child pornography or, if there really are some who are "hosted" on servers that are in countries whose laws apply the necessary sharpness. Instead of whole departments sift through the BKA the Internet for child pornography websites, you can set up virtual stop signs by the respective providers and spends the rest of the time to managing and testing the derived lists, could these people also work specifically that the horrible images will be deleted directly. Putting the focus on the targeted deletion of child pornography on Internet servers, this approach is not as difficult as the government It wants to sell to the voters and people always effective.
Of course, this is child pornography and also of child abuse contained hardly noticeable, so it deals with only a small part of the overall problem. Stupid way (otherwise I can not even express) stigmatized the government that small area of crime against children as a top priority in the fight against global organized "child porn mafia", except in the even exists. Prostitution of children takes place in real life, mostly in countries where the Internet has no meaning for either perpetrator or victim. Child abuse is also behind closed doors in homes in family environment instead of the perpetrators are not interested to draw attention on the Internet for their transgressions. There is no question that there is a pedophile scene, exchanging the corresponding image and video material, but even that barely touches on the WWW. The Internet is mostly used as transport and communication. Internet censorship will be there no solution, we have asked other, more efficient measures that have been shown here and elsewhere so already. Why do the politicians of the Federal Government, led by Federal Minister for Family Affairs Ursula von der Leyen, vehemently so hard on a method that is doomed to failure even before its launch?
Even under the Pretext and the belief that even this small aspect (child pornography on servers in the WWW) of the overall problem "child abuse" is to fight successfully, the method is hardly promising and very efficient.
Looking at an example of the Danish block list, you will find that use most of the domains listed in the top-level domain com . This is awarded by the U.S. company Verisign . VeriSign also runs the same two DNS root servers, so to speak, the top Hirarchiestufe the name resolution on the Internet. Now we've already established that as a U.S. company Verisign is subject to the laws of the United States, which we all know that child pornography is sufficient under law. It is beyond me, but that so many sleazy sites with top-level domain com may be in circulation, but if the legal situation is clarified? Why do some states still have to operate with such block lists?
You should also know that include the domains on the block lists only a fraction of actual child pornography, while the rest is mostly pornography, but it is without children or with extremely young looking actors, a well-intended suggestion. Still other domains have relatively little or nothing to do with pornography, and some exist not even. That says little for the currency and the maintenance of these CRLs will, but at the BKA much work better (?)
Thus, if a contracting authority of top-level domains such as Verisign not clearly complies with the laws of the United States and followed, I have serious doubts the sincerity of the politicians who are advocating to the public for a tough prosecution of child pornography. The web surfer who accidentally gets a stop sign side is put under general suspicion, earning the company, millions of dollars to the award and administration of domain names (including child pornography), are obviously outside the legal system. Here smell something enormous?
climb the ladder a step higher, one comes to the concept ICANN not around. The acronym stands for Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers which means that here determines which IP addresses and domain names which are in circulation. The "foundation" the Commerce Department reports directly to, which means that the U.S. government basically is in charge.
Then there are the former "One Man Show" IANA (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority), a quasi suborganization of ICANN, which delegated the assignment of IP address ranges to various local establishments. Also in this case, the U.S. government has the absolute influence.
one wanted to act effectively against child pornography and useful on the web, as far as the plans of Federal Family Minister Ursula von der Leyen equivalent, would therefore be with the Government of the United States to the right place. You fight child pornography on the Internet at the roots and leaves in the first place, that these domains can arise, the Internet blocking Zensursula seem downright ridiculous. but someone is violating existing laws, these organizations left in the duty to intervene against it. If they do not, they make themselves liable to prosecution. Where your there are difficulties, transnational combat child pornography, one need but in 99% of cases only in the political, economic and military partner to contact or United States relations are on a humanitarian level, much worse?
What do you do now with the percentage of domains that you can not directly lay with existing laws lame? All right to the BKA these domains rely on a restricted list so that you can not reach them, but please, with no stop sign, data collection! This one would not anyway, but this task should not only be taken by the BKA and sovereign. Apart from the blacklist would rather clearly would fail and ultimately unnecessary. Has been adduced sufficient evidence that the Internet and why locks are useless, at least if one wants to aim only to combat child pornography. It would be about time that the proponents of blocking plans to present themselves sound facts. I call on the supporters of stop signs campaign to prove the following:
Present your once a single Internet presence with a proven child pornography, which can not be removed from the web and only DNS Access Blocking left as appropriate countermeasure is!
I'm waiting ...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)