The end of privacy ...
(The way the police state) is the title of a book by Peter Schaar . Who does not know who is Peter Schaar , was supposed to quickly move his computer from the wall outlet and buried his cell phone somewhere far away. Perhaps I exaggerate a little subtle with my claim and would like to object strongly that we should not prostitute to the communication media.
The Internet censorship is one of the most desirable goals of leaders of every political orientation, as we were recently demonstrated by the law on the reduction of access to child pornography in communication networks . What good is a democracy, the ruling elite in their own people suspected terrorists without exception, pedophiles, left-and right-wing and many more gradations of criminals? A dark Perspective is revealed to those who want the signs of time have known and try to interpret this ...
It would take too long to put together all the puzzle pieces of an effort by the "transparent citizen" and so I leave it like those whose interests I could wake you. I would like to point out alone on a puzzle-particles, can be forged as refined an elaborate conspiracy against the public eye.
The aforementioned law against the fight against child pornography on 18 June 2009 by the grand coalition of CDU / CSU and SPD agreed. Contrary to all the objections of IT and legal experts, a law was passed, which is totally unsuitable for the actual projects to combat child pornography. Facts have been deliberately ignored and an unprecedented campaign of lies you have the people the necessity of this measure quasi intravenously infused into a pattern of thought do-gooders. (The background and facts are found incidentally in other papers within this blog, so I details not again want to run separately, which are not yet documented.)
supported by the media and lobbyists with the most part politically conservative attitudes and linkages in party political values, could the population of almost unlimited the need for a creeping censorship of the Internet to be convinced. The relatively few "rebels", all of which originate from the love shown to be negative "net community", it was thought obvious to ignore. Contrary to all expectations of the political elite, however, sparked a virtual fire that could not be more clear, not least because of this evil abyss Internet, which somehow did not want to be censored.
Man had not expected to be evident in the information technology, contrary to the policy of each sequence can be embarrassing recorded and documented so that we reconstruct almost mathematical precision with many things can. It was thus possible to expose the lies of the campaign, Ursula von der Leyen and shake at least a part of the public awake. (I would like to reiterate at this point to express the brave people of the "online world" as the makers of netzpolitik.org , thank Working Group censorship , Frank Heine and of course all the other combatants against Internet censorship, without which perhaps the situation would be much worse.)
Despite overwhelming online petition could be dissuaded from the plan the government does not censor the Internet by law. It took no evidence against the proven lies and even predicted that a one could be extended as a censorship tool installed system to other areas as child pornography easily have been averted with false activism.
Too bad only that the lobbyists could not wait to try to claim their own desires publicly. Child pornography can now be so demonstrably not fight with the law it passed really, but censorship is thus still possible. But this will require a new legal basis, since the constitutional violation not committed again can be accomplished in such a short time.
Now I lean with my other excesses very much out of the window and am well aware that I have no evidence it own and it could also completely different course, as I speculate ...
The ZugErschwG should actually 1 August 2009 to take effect. The lead Ministry, headed by Dr. Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, however the law for notification to the EU to send, which means that the Zensursula-Posse to 8 was laid in October 2009 on the political ice. Meanwhile, on 27 September is randomly election and detractors now claim that the law under the so-called principle of discontinuity
could no longer be used. Among other things, was the signing of the law by the President to lapse. From the Economic Ministry and the family were opposing statements, but I felt the rather gentle agitation to the failed timely entry into force of the law personally significant. but is otherwise Ursula von der Leyen known to be very vocal and media attention to perceive if they do not get what she wants, so she stayed back suspicious ...
Even if one should assume that would grant Horst Köhler at the Office of the President ZugErschwG , the awful law of course is the Federal Constitutional Court still to come. In the hope that it put an end to the nonsense, I look to the future were it not for this most enduring distrust of such suspended states.
brings me back to Peter Schaar, the Federal Data Protection Commissioner and I wanted to know from him how he assesses his next moves. It was well known in the law in 2 Edition decided that a five-member committee appointed by him, which was to quarterly and randomly check the secret block list of the BKA. Actually, you should assume that 1 August 2009 This task should be clearly defined, because by law it should be possible at any time that this body can check the list at its discretion. This was Reason enough for me to look into this, not least of all that no one has yet been defined, the exact procedure.
following request I sent therefore to the authority of the Supervisor:
Good day,
I have very aggressively pursuing the debate on the recently passed Access aggravation law ... Despite the benefits of these restrictions applied interests me a completely different issue that is not really in the whole of the debate came into play: How should the control be implemented?
I am quite aware that quarterly spot checks should be carried out and if necessary at any time, but this statement can not really satisfactory, except that I have the level of control anyway ridiculous think, if one assumes that each day included an average of 200 new entries in the list
should (as reported by the Federal Family Minister Ursula von der Leyen, whose evidence in this which anyway never really true). Now I have heard that the BKA wanted to work with an Excel spreadsheet as a blocking list, which would forward it daily to the provider. Only after vehement insistence on the part of providers could convince the
authority that this type of data transport, inappropriate and is also uncertain. Now presents itself to me as IT'ler the question of which People in charge of BKA be such a sensitive, security-issue when people do not even consider this a shortcoming in an unencrypted file format and send these controversial data possibly even as a succinct collection
email? It would be desirable to define the form of a secure data transmission. could be encrypted using the VPN tunnel so you accept? Finally, one must also wonder how the controls of the CRL
be carried out? Sends the BKA also the revocation list as an Excel spreadsheet in an email attachment to the privacy advocates? That would, of course, ridiculous. Even if the data protection without notice at the BKA would make representations, they might not ever even know if they have presented the actual list, possibly as an Excel list ...
As for now ensure that the inspectors actually check the real, current lock list? A meaningful answer, I would look forward to.
On 10 , 2009, note the date, reached me this reply:
Dear *,
take it not to, that the "surveillance" of authority was assigned to my block list. The independent expert body to review the revocation list will be appointed by me only, ie the members are chosen by me. This process is still ongoing. be carried out in what way the controls, the Panel will specify. I assume that such information be published in due course
.
For questions regarding the restricted list, please contact the responsible BKA. Surely you have seen from the media that the law currently in the notification is in Brussels. With the entry into force is not expected before October.
Sincerely
It is thus defined long after the actual entry into force of the law still does not know how to perform such an examination wants. Either procedure is required, I ask the committee or Peter Schaar, not with the necessary care to be or was in some (government) parties had known in advance that this law would not be implemented on time. I just can not imagine that Peter Schaar so unprepared for such a topic would be addressed largely haphazard? One had to assume that in fact 1 August 2009, a review of the blacklist would have taken place. Accordingly, would inevitably have to be a clearly defined procedure provides what obviously is not. This leads to the sole conclusion to Peter Schaar holds a responsible Privacy advocates that even in its clear authority before 1 date August was announced in 2009 that this law would not in time to take effect.
This would also explain the current transmission of the key ministries. Somehow, I gain more and more the impression that the ZugErschwG its creators is suddenly no longer so important to present at least in form. Ursula von der Leyen takes their former pet project apparently deliberately out of any campaign event. What more recently appeared as important, namely the apparent combat child pornography, which should be implemented in a rush through a law of media attention, has seemingly lost its urgency? Whether on to Brussels is now the 7th July 2009 sent to notify the legal text of the first version was incorrect and later corrected version of the entry into force of the law on until at least 1 November has delayed, plays a minor role. can be seen clearly in each case that at least a delay of more harmful for the campaign intends to issue was.
The strategy for the CDU / CSU will rise. It has to start the campaign theme (child pornography) taken in order to mobilize votes. First, we had not reckoned with the known reactions that bring side effects as bad polls could, but has applied to Ursula von der Leyen in association with the fight against child pornography phychological quite a clever tactic. That of all the SPD with the approval of the Act, at a time when it was very controversial, the displeasure of the CDU / CSU and drew away to himself, I call sheer stupidity. That just further SPD politician in later on, not only in the dispute about ZugErschwG had gotten wet feet, the CDU / CSU officials have noticed with satisfaction. It may run for the CDU / CSU is not magnificent, as long as the notification process 27 Of September last.
One need not be a clairvoyant, to predict that the CDU / CSU is well formed (most likely) with the FDP in the next legislative period the government. However, I would like to recall the abused children were abused again for a shabby, in my view the election campaign.
Click here for previous articles: explains The Zugangser-Schwesig Act and how Brigitte Zypries the Internet
0 comments:
Post a Comment