Wednesday, December 23, 2009

Follando Con Dolly Parton

Bells of Sweetness!

this year I will unfortunately not one of the legendary Weihnachtsgigs of Phillip Boa in Leipzig (am 27.12. Even with the previously discussed Me And The White Tiger ) may attend. But that does nothing, I finally had the pleasure back in February, the master of the to experience Diamonds case tour in the Moritzbastei. And there probably already more or less a greatest hits set is played, there is at this point suitable for Christmas my personal wish-set list, which live in any case impossible to implement is - of course with two encores, as befits a good Boa Concert heard. Merry Christmas!

Laugh, Planet
On Tuesdays I'm Not As Young
1996 Fiat Topolino

I'm An Ex-Half Pop Star
Johnny the Liar
peach iron
International mosquito
The Songs of Life 1 2 3 4
Scotland Yard
Kiss My Soul
Jane Wyman
Eva in the Froggarden
Get Terminated!
Down
They Say Hurray
East-Bunny Jumps
Deep in Velvet
Slipstream
The Race is Over
Revolution Bebe
Rome in the Rain
And Then She Kissed Her
In Freudian Underwear
-----
Mothballs
I Don ' t Need Your Summer
Drinking and Belonging To the Sea of Life Rap
-----

Annie Flies The Love-bomber

Sunday, November 29, 2009

Is Quadriderm Nf Safe On Piercings

Kevin Blechdom - Gentlemania

at the annual listing of the best records that the year has so produced, have I, at least in recent years can see a trend in my personal favorites: in addition to a consensus favorite plate, on which some can all play, is always a good shot on the front seats, which went down in verglichsweise Hipsterkreisen. Last year it was with Gustav "Leave the city," may this year, Kristin Erickson aka Kevin Blechdom can celebrate - for their latest album "Gentlemania" and a concert grand ...


known fact, for experimental electronic sounds - first as one half of electro duo Blectum from Blechdom and later released two solo albums - wanted Kevin Blechdom now make a record, "which even her mother, her can play to friends without having to feel embarrassed "(Spex Nr.320 May / June 09).
Nevertheless, an unusual, even eccentric album is the outcome, the biggest difference to earlier works, especially in the choice of instruments, to electronic sound experiments was waived in favor of classical instrumentation with lots of piano. What has remained is metal dome penchant for melodramatic pop that was also on their electronic boards are already present and to "Gentlemania 'very clearly expressed. Songs like "Lazy," "Face the music" or "Turn Around" to name a few, have enormous potential and very catchy melodies moving.


metal dome penchant for theatricality, which constitutes a major attraction of the album allows the plate shine live primarily a work of art, as in April in the Leipzig scale where Kevin Blechdom with an illustrious group of versatile MitmusikerInnen under Mrs . Pepsteins Radio-anniversary gala in their musical stage play "Slobbersville" performed and inspire so that even people who would otherwise likely have little left over for musicals and rock operas, understand. With a conventional musical performance was in any case only in common the fact that telling the dramatic structure of the set a more complex history, as well as various dance routines that are always entertaining, but never came embarrassing. In addition, lively instruments were replaced (all parties seemed each to master at least two) and the leading roles made the rounds: so did each of the band members the opportunity to sing a song to shine as a protagonist, even though Kevin Blechdom undoubtedly as a band leader of the Star of evening was. One of the concerts of the year, which brought the writer of these lines to the realization that if even musical, then your so beautiful!

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Shuffle Battery Replacement

Live: Psychic TV @ dance bar range, Hall


It has a touch of Warhol's Factory and The Velvet Underground, Psychic TV when their hypnotic, in part, ten-minute psychedelic numbers present and Genesis P-Orridge this is quite the diva cross between Nico and Divine. However, GPO is not under suspicion of nostalgia, but had explored over the last 30 years in all projects (COUM Transmissions, Throbbing Gristle, Psychic TV, etc.) visionary possibilities. A certain tendency to the sixties, especially their more extreme moments in performance art, music, drug culture and neuro-psychology was, yet has always felt. With the recent Psychic TV reincarnation (PTV3) to Thee Majesty moved together with the former bassist Alice Sexpod genesis and some younger MitmusikerInnen in psychedelic realms, not least as a musical accompaniment to the pandrogyny concept, a kind of transcendence of biological serve as a mere shell of the body understood. The result is this idea of exile in America with the artist and intellectual partner Lady Jaye Breyer, who was tragically killed two years ago, but thanks to video projections to actual concerts are always present. Musically, this results in a setting of the early nineties acid house experiments with more or less conventional rock instruments. HOW TO PTV3 even completely free of old hits. The staff of the Whispers record store was like to express once again to have made such a concert highlight in Hall organizationally possible!



Friday, October 30, 2009

Are Insects Attracted To Dandruff

The Sonic Boom Foundation / Me And The White Tiger


Rave is back. Zomby paid homage to the beginning of the year with his dubstep version of the UK 'Artkore the early nineties, and even the veterans The Prodigy sound on their latest album as if for "Charly" and "Everybody in the Place" Not a week passed. In a similar notch beat the Leipzig The Sonic Boom Foundation already with her self-titled debut album. On their current EP "Resistant to Change" they make with the title track first exactly where in the last year left off: rich bass, rave sirens and priceless voice, somewhere between the Happy Mondays, The KLF and ARE Weapons. "On the Hook" can then unusually restrained rhythm filling the rock roots reminiscent of the band before the "Alien to Me redoing the whole rave Arsenal will be driven to metal learn synth riffs, bratz term Oktavbasslinien and analog electronics Limonite. The most exciting track is, however, the eight-minute "Ignorance is Bliss", which begins at first like a dark version of EMF and turned over after three and a half minutes in a real dub monster. FMlyn sets the whole thing with his geezerhaften song, one of the more Audio Bullys than Shaun Ryder recalled to the crown. Connewitz rave on!

Also with new material at the start are Me And The White Tiger who delivered should at the beginning of the year with "I Am the Enemy" a secret dance floor-filler at the splices. The edgy, always in black and yellow tape-held aesthetic is very reminiscent of the industrial chic of the Hacienda, which otherwise would have been less than TSBF the Manchester sound of the early nineties Godfather. Instead, on her new song "We Are Discoteque", to which was the first time a video shot, especially similarities with Scandinavian electropop acts such as Moa, The Knife, Luomo audible and especially Gus Gus. Both the sound and the song is a pleasant contrast with the provincial stuffiness that seems to now dominate both the indie scene and the glossy pop from Flensburg to Konstanz. It would be desirable that Me and the White Tiger with their debut album "Hedonist" , which will be released soon, get beyond the Leipzig city limits deserved appreciation. Otherwise you can with "We Are Discoteque" and a concert at the Leipzig Moritzbastei 27.12. put off.

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Appeal Letter For Financial Reinstatement

90-99: Slowdive


The umbrella term "shoegazing" were some bands of the late 80's / early 90's combined, their unifying characteristics is the combination of wall-of-sound to break down guitars and otherworldly vocals could. For many groups, limited the application of this formula but the parroting of the "Psycho Candy 'Catechism', but were well off the right in the sky acclaimed My Bloody Valentine bands that earn the bye.
Slowdive, founded in 1989 and at a time of their first singles were more highly praised, with their albums, unfortunately, in a phase in which the British music press had already dealt with more grunge and Britpop. Interest in further Shoegazekapelle, which also very little value on attitude and directness presented was, barely - in addition to infamous quote from Nicky Wire themselves in NME and Melody Maker are many colorful bad reviews (Dave Simpson to Souvlaki : "I would rather drown choking in a bath full of porridge than ever listen to it again ").


Only in retrospect became the band dissolved in 1995 a certain status, especially in electronic oriented musicians (remember was on the Morr Music released, but unfortunately only nice place good Slowdive Tribute Compilation ). For what sets them apart from comparable groups, is produced by the massive editing and estrangement of the guitars flowing soundscape that relies less on riffs than on the overlapping of areas. This Slowdive sound even in their loudest and dissonant moments caught and suspended, for example, " Albatross " from the " Holding Our Breath " EP, and is thus the similar quasi-ambient early Seefeel very close . More than this (also great) post-rave group was Slowdive are still at the songwriting to the center. After a bit immature in this regard debut "Just for a Day " (1991) and some EPs followed, therefore, with " Souvlaki " a collection of ten dramatic and distant songs that have it actually hit qualities, especially, of course, "Alison " and "When The Sun Hits . Due to the above time difference in mind the UK and most massive problems with the American label there, but no chart success. " Souvlaki" is of course still a great album, which in part with the highly revered by the band was included Brian Eno and contains "Souvlaki Space Station " an unusually Dub-heavy track, who might well (published also in 1993) by Seefels debut album "Quique " come. This piece has already indicated the direction in which the band would develop further.


because the balance between song and track is on the last album, Pygmalion "shifted more in favor of sound experiments. Already on the "5-EP " Slowdive had begun to bring their growing interest in electronic dance music in their music. Well as a defiant response to Creation label boss Alan McGee's claim, but finally to deliver a chart hit, the band now constructed from even more distorted vocals and guitar loops an elegiac album with very associative, between 1 and 10 minutes long tracks that create it to sound simultaneously strange and familiar tremendously. leached from the lavish production and the lack of success the band split after this masterpiece, however.

Founded after a short time by the three-Slowdive members Neil Halstead, Rachel Goswell and Ian McCutcheon quasi-sequel, Mojave 3 is still active, but moved into more conventional 60s pop and folk realms. But Slowdive influence away from the bands is the most explicit reference to Shoegaze especially when many of the more melancholy post-rock and electronica musicians in recent years (Pan American, Labradford, ...) obviously.

Monday, September 7, 2009

Average American Women's Dress Size

Gilbert Blecken - Destination: Pop


fanzines took in the pop culture of the nineties, a position not to be underestimated. About the informative content, they acted before the great breakthrough of the World Wide Web in some subcultures, such as the Riot Grrrl movement, as an essential exchange forums. In contrast to pre-interviews from conventional music postils is intrinsic to the fanzine of particular appeal to approach off the obligatory promotional themes the artists. At the same time it poses a risk for the makers harsh rejections, the most heroic image of revered artists scratch and in extreme cases lead to separation from loved frustrated disks.

At this point - the direct contact with the artist - is baring with Gilbert Destination: of pop, a collection that gives a retrospective overview of 20 years of his own fanzine activity. In addition to the 50 interviews, of which most have not been published so far, you have to do here with a meta-discourse on the possibilities and limitations of the interview. Preliminary information for each call situation give an insight on to the author in the preface, "how musicians behave towards their fans." Certainly no unambitious projects, thanks detailed descriptions of experiences is very changeable, but the demands. Particularly exciting read here the nightmarish negative experiences. Here can not mince his mouth and with a healthy dose of self-irony and the author's own art described the escalation as an example, a rough, Tori Amos Tour Manager spoil the day really.

And then of course there are the interviews themselves: see the respondents are quite a few artists that have been relevant in the last three decades. The models range from bands that had at the time of the interview its peak already and act accordingly relaxed (as Propaganda, The Associates, Scritti Politti) of becoming stars on the way up (Blur, Nirvana) to former hopefuls who have since often been unjustly forgotten (Voice Of The Beehive, Sexus, crossover). A review of this kind is from today's point of view with respect to interest the recent pop-cultural issues: recurrent discourses on music formats (CD versus vinyl back then, downloads today) or short-lived fads - just the few people probably remember today to Romo -, British-American differences or The influence of drug use on musical productions. Just

new interviews with old heroes spray while a certain whiff of nostalgia, as when James Bradfield on the controversial and infamous press performances by Manic Street Preachers (a band who then pulled out a huge Fanzinekultur after him, and laid great importance to their creative supporters) says. Besides offering a chronological arrangement of interviews, starting with Marc Almond in 1990, and the pleasure of the experience over the years, progressive professionalization of the author himself with. All this makes "Destination: Rock 'just more than an extensive interview collection.

Monday, August 31, 2009

Pearl Jam Bootlegs Blog

Kid Sister

"I'm helping give hip-hop a much-needed facelift. Hip-hop got so gosh darn boring after a while and so formulaic, its almost like hip-hop became a victim of itself for so long because people that made hip-hop music it wanted to become mainstream and it was not. "
(Kid Sister in Format Mag )



In the last eighteen months already complex artists like Santogold, Janelle Monáe and Amanda Blank made, each with very opinionated approaches on a combination of Hip Hop, R'n'B, Indie , rave and pop attention. With Kid Sister now sends to another artist to continue this Ekklektizismus of a hip-hop context from. Melisa Young grew up in the southern suburbs of Chicago and started her musical studies for a film career in the context of club nights the DJ team Flosstradamus. Accordingly, it was first made last year in a club context: as a guest rapper of the British dance production team The Count & Sinden, she gave the bass line Kracher "Beeper" the necessary flow.

Kid shine Sisters own singles with a combination of hip hop, house, pop and electro clash, which they touch interfaces where already Avenue D, Bunny Rabbit, or Fanny Pack moving - such as the bass -stressed Electro-track "Control", in collaboration with Kanye West caused "Pro Nails" and "Get Fresh", where a reduced instrumented with a verse in the early Dizzee Rascal not unlike rap (before it went on shaky Trance paths ) meet the harmonies of Mylos "Drop the Pressure". The most convincing this mixture well to succeed the current single "Right Hand Hi" with dance floor compatible synthesizer riffs, rave quotes and a catchy hands in the air -chorus. That it can go musically quite different, proving Young and guest rapper David Banner on the casual hip-hop track "Family Reunion", the both reminiscent of 90s R & B artists like SWV and to the soulful excursions of house pioneers Inner City.

Indeed many of the existing sound tracks from Kid Sister as a contemporary version of Hip House, that genre that quickly disappeared after a brief flowering in 1989 from the scene and only occasionally aufschwappte again. In an interview with Format Mag she revealed that this mixture has a lot to do with the musical past of her hometown, the birthplace of house sounds in the mid eighties: "It comes part-and-parcel with living in this city, no matter who you are, even if you're the hardest ass dude, you will have some house. (...) I do know that in Chicago, you can be a convicted gang member, convicted of killing someone like, it does not matter. You will like the gayest house ever. It's a very strange phenomenon but it's part of living here. "

After several delays finally soon the debut album, which is dominated, according to his own statements, especially from faster hip hop and house tracks will be released. Besides co-production with The Count & Sinden and XXXChange Spank Rock will probably be primarily a collaboration with the British MC Estelle a promising climax. Both worked earlier this year on song "First Ladies" together for a repeat of the classic by Monie Love and Queen Latifah - understood unambiguously as a homage "to the ladies who came first without being too cheesy. You can not cross the line into the land of cheese. I think we steered clear of that ". In the opening quotation of Hip Hop announced Aufmöbelung should therefore be nothing in the path.

Saturday, August 22, 2009

Sweet Dreams Piano Notalari

How Zensursula its name is (?)

The definition of the word censorship can be complex, as Wikipedia assessed this:

censorship (censura) is a political procedures to the mass media or in the personal services (such as by post ) gave content to control or suppress undesirable laws that run counter to provide content and thus ensure that only desired content to be published or shared.

This brief, but accurate explanation should suffice to illustrate. that has received Federal Family Minister Ursula von der Leyen their nickname because of the notorious difficulty Access Act against the spread of child pornography, is now not a novelty anymore. So far, however, was the name "Zensursula" exclusively on the side effects of Internet blocking due to a key part of this access difficulty Act ...

A video of Mirror Online shows that censorship also to her or her party colleague Gitta Connemann obviously happy to be applied and relevant. The accompanying press release can be found here . Since I am neither a lawyer nor a journalist, I can make do not know if and who was invited to this event or whether general may attend any of these events and may. To this end I have to rely on expert declaration and would be glad if this would take but one, a comment function is given ...

update from 27.08.2009
In Empty Generalanzeiger found something like an opinion of Gitta Connemann to the incident with the mirror-TV team in child flu

... This writes the Leeranerin, it had informed the editor of "Mirror TV" about the fact that it is the appointment is no public date constitutes "good reason, after all, where children of nursery age were assembled with one thing: a right to their own image, the parents informed were from the community Westoverledingen and had agreed that the photographs would make these photos were provided so the.. required parental consent. A film company was not desired. A film permit by the municipality Westoverledingen as hostess was not present. "It was certainly a difference if the photo printed of a child aged three years in the local newspaper with the consent of parents will be identified or vulnerable on a number of television viewers and Internet visitors can, according to the MPs: "Discussion Item in the matter, visit by Minister von der Leyen? is therefore not an alleged violation of press freedom. Rather it is about the desperate attempt of a journalist, in violation of domestic law and personal rights of children is a film portrait of produce through the back door ."...

basically puts this statement the supposed freedom of the press. Remains an open question However, why then ever previously issued a press release? Furthermore, it is incomprehensible why not in this release was made clear that this deadline is a closed society of charged persons? one hand is the consent of the parents of the infants cared for there to photos given by the press, on the other hand, this should exclude any further press work such as film shooting by a team from Spiegel TV commentary. I understand now no longer what it publishes press releases and press freedom is defined as ...

comment feature also forms the transition to another case, a different kind of censorship. As I mentioned earlier, I am not a lawyer and you may forgive my amateur opinion should ever have to do so. On various web sites, that such comment functions. In my opinion for that area to offer this to the author of articles a way to connect with readers to interact and provide readers with a public discussion based on the treated subject to offer. If no comment is desired, can also disable this feature. As it is, however, to judge if a web site operator, the comment function first makes available and, upon receipt of various comments that were not weighed him, turned off abruptly and without comment and the comments made by then virtual nirvana banned?

Is it a coincidence that of all Family Minister Ursula von der Leyen is again of the party, as the CDU-Sulzbach local association, the comments the article "Sympathetic woman smitten Sulzbach " disabled after some comments represent a markedly opposite view to the appearance of the Minister. It is, of course, any operator of a site permitted and in some cases mandatory, content that are illegal or offensive seem to remove. In the current case, I could not find such, only has strongly criticized the practice Ursula von der Leyen and criticized especially their rhetoric during their propaganda event. If any comments should have in fact contravene netiquette, it certainly would have been sufficient to remove only these individual disorders. However, without comment, the comment function was disabled on this article ...

My comment, which was initially released for about 1 day was so:

The lies of the campaign, Ursula von der Leyen
Do not worry, I will maintain the netiquette and factual arguments. The video from the auditorium in Sulzbach, where Mrs. von der Leyen offered about 7 minutes against alleged Internet blocking their fight against child pornography in a complete argument, haunted by the "evil" Internet. Although all their specious arguments are refuted, without exception, it retains eagerly made use of it. Of course it applies to combat child pornography, but the choice of means should be farsighted be selected. The stop signs of the so-called access difficulty to the law are good or not much, but suggest ignorant fellow citizens, this woman is doing what von der Leyen for abused children. She does not just, but covered only the terrible image documents from the Internet community. Functioning measures have been offered to her, but she insisted on a solution, which only damaged the constitution, established a censorship infrastructure and to help abuse victims in any way. Can it really be that party members tolerate unscrupulous machinations of this or is anyone in the CDU's local chapter so far have noticed that Mrs. von der Leyen taken at least at this point, a direction has, which is completely absurd. About the invariable applause after it had carried out their fake numbers and bogus arguments, I was more than surprised. If for all blind and deaf from the CDU, or do they just do not have true, that this woman publicly distributed lies? An opinion would be desirable ...






Whether it is now in the process actually is censorship, I do not want to look more closely, feel it, but annoying when pruned in this form, the freedom of expression just because one criticism can bear. The "friendly woman smitten Sulzbach" therefore continue exceptionally pure and ...

Tuesday, August 18, 2009

Water In My Airbake Cookie Sheet

The area of Cybercop and how the Urpils Zensursula met

If a debate, the German regions of raison d'etat reached, things can go very fast. With some delay - the numbers have been known for a long time - has got around that drive right-wing German countries all over the world on Internet Save up to abuse. Source: BBC News has

contrast, Jörg-Olaf Schäfers of netzpolitik.org that statistics are only as good as they are presented, since Mr. Clauss apparently exactly the figures support that jugendschutz.net of published . There is talk of such sites in 1707 with right background, with the note "more than ever before." One should know this, that right-wing speech is prohibited as strict as anywhere in Germany. In the U.S., this is even completely legal and there are also the most online sites, which is not mentioned whether the researched figure refers to the German-speaking countries or the entire web. The latter would qualify the clear and inevitable thing in regard to the fact that the Internet is growing, not shrinking, seem logical, if not encouraging. By the way, the world population grows in a now threatening degree and when, once again spreads a rampage at a school headlines, of course, play too many nerds killer games and are to blame ...

The brown propaganda in this country that is just so hastily available, as they would on the Internet computer the neighbor next door.

Here Ulrich Clauss revealed his ignorance of IT technology. If you have never told him that local network technology are by no means relevant distances and the values adjacent to already have some know-how must be able to provide on their PC retrievable data. It should already be a web server or FTP server so that you the usual colorful Internet environment can be experienced via a browser. Of course, neighbor has also its own domain which is of course resolved via DNS on the Internet. Certainly feasible, but by no means "so hastily" as with service providers, even far away from the computer of Mr. Clauss. But that is another issue, a technical ...

In the land of punishable Auschwitz lie that is now calling those on the scene, who knew so far do not quite know how to deal with the network and especially its fans is . Among them are many who are eyeing suspicious for a long time as' free indeed "appearing cyberspace, but so far not with Ursula von der Leyen's strange defense method on child pornography wanted to do something.

Wen Mr. Clauss said that now is left to the imagination of his readers. Will be meant to party rebels in the SPD and the FDP, or an undefined intersection of the Green Party?


It is beyond the here available space to explain why, in the wake of the German Bundestag passed a law to block child pornography sites, a consensus for action against other - no less creepy - content but was not achievable.

Here Mr. Clauss proposes a bridge that has never existed and, according to government never will, at least up to 4 hours after the adoption of the access difficulty Law.


any event, the debate should continue to gain momentum, now, when it comes to the "consensus of all Democrats - is - the defense of any Nazi filth. Very difficult it will now have those who reject questionable procedure with reference to the power locks than "censorship".


Obviously Mr. Clauss believe that if the power locks are already unfit for combat child pornography, but one could alternatively apply it to Nazi propaganda? Censorship continues to refuse, even if Mr. Clauss no alternative knows and believes that this is the last word ...


It is one of the historically developed peculiarities of this country, that consensus is set to intervene against right always to be on their feet rather than one against child pornography. Hopefully this time the constitution to all the tricks - and not just single key topic.


the statement is presumptuous and even gives the impression that the German right-wing's worst nightmare. That might apply to him personally, but abuse victims and their parents, I confess quite another primary enemy to. Also for unaffected, which I count, hopefully, other factors will apply for the assessment?

The following movie review is then fit to the overall discussion, which has now removed much of the fight against child pornography, used the Internet as a bottomless evil criminal swamp:



http://www.youtube .com / watch? v = K_6QOQvBZ5E & feature = player_embedded

"The biggest crime scene in the world" for Rainer Wendt, to demand the head of the police union, the Internet and takes this opportunity to 2,000 new positions. "Cyber Cops", it should be, regardless of the suspicion to go on the internet patrol to investigate crimes.
How can you imagine that now? In large offices in 2000 officials sit in front of the screen and browse the web to track virtual illegal parking? The idea is not absurd to accept as one should, because in the video as an example, a Web site used cheaters. That can now align welcome in this particular case, a Cybercop little, apparently without much relevance. Subscription sites on the Internet are not new and the customer is actually glued largely protected by existing laws. You do not usually respond to demands for payment once their goal is merely a refined threatening gesture, but on very shaky legal leg is ...
out more here: http://www.ayin.at/firewall/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=418

Now I switch to the off-conscious world, and I consider the so-called coffee trips . The comparison should be justified because the methodology is similar. In both cases one could speak of confidence trick, but what about the police patrol in the offline world? Trips disguised as a coffee sales events with price promise there is not just since last week, but where is the demand for more police presence on coffee runs?

And come back the right-wing Internet sites into the game, the existence for more media literacy required to teenagers can protect themselves. In the video review itself is already pointed out that this Cybercops also not sufficient. What do we need this now Cybercops at all?

It is remarkable how the argument dissolves for more human resources in the form of work-related Internet surfing even if the statements in the video report only long enough to think ...

But the biggest crime scene in the world, the Internet, as it would have us believe lobbyists and politicians, there are certainly other criminal acts?

are not many people with fake bank sites to substantial sums of money robbed? In technical language we speak of phishing . In fact, this corresponds to the truth, but requires a lot of ignorance of those concerned with the use of emails and websites, and a certain naivete in dealing with their personal data. In the offline world, there are also counterparts do. Manipulation of ATMs up to the lapidary pickpocket is no less lucrative. Where is the police presence, here is helpful to the victims to the side? There is demand for it is not, but on the Internet to 2000 Cybercops prevent phishing? How are they to do that ...?

One could turn this turn around times!

The financial crisis was neither the Internet nor the internet triggered. Greedy bankers and investment managers have driven entire industries out of business. Government and citizens have to bear the debt burden and responsibility, while by now it was revealed that the perpetrators continue long since her wicked doings under the eyes of the legislature. Where are the voices that call for censorship in the financial world?

I recently saw a report on Panorama , where the government approved the managers, despite government subsidies million dollar bonuses and salaries that were previously criticized media coverage of the same people. Where in the offline world, the call is for regulation?

embarrassing the reputation of politicians and lobbying for better control of the Internet, if you look at the scandal look at the Puma armored . Would it not make more sense and provide more appropriate to our political decision-makers under better control before you want to censor the Internet? Somehow it seems to me that wanted to deflect as the politicians and their lobbyists of himself ... That had

Ursula von der Leyen, recently used in Sulzbach (Saar), a propaganda event of the local CDU local associations for their hypocritical fight against child pornography, one could have imagined. Although I request the concerned operators the opportunity to put questions to Ms von der Leyen put this matter to be able to consent had heard this was possible in the course of the event at any stage. Democracy is what claims the demagogue Ursula von der Leyen for himself.


A detailed analysis will save me, they exist already: reasoning test

Update: The original report of the author Jan aka Urpils:

So - after my Fortunately, the video has spread so nicely, here are my impressions from the evening of "Zensursulavideos"

I could not understand quite why exactly in our small town Mrs von der Leyen for the election had to be there or wanted to - but the opportunity to ask her in person a few questions and experience the following reactions, and could miss I would not. Therefore, I thought, from a longer request, in which I first wanted to thank her for that she had managed to send such a large amount of previously politically less active people in the Pirate Party and other organizations to FINALLY against tackle the constant monitoring and restriction madness of the current government. Furthermore, it was clear that it is superior to me entirely rhetorically, why I did not want to be limited to technical detail. Rather, I intended to tell her that I think intelligent enough for her to know the impact of Internet blocking really have, and how she could reconcile it with their conscience, to have opened Pandora's box. During her speech I was very - very - soon realized that this question had done ... The sharpness and falsity of their speech, it was simply impossible for me to send even a positive word to them - even if it was ironic. After a journey of family policy, the financial crisis and highlighting various "feats" of the CDU garnered thunderous applause, began their - well known - Speak to the Internet Lock. That was one of those moments that I will never forget. In the faces of those present, I read only the approval, acceptance and joy of the minister, while crossed my mind more a matter that I felt myself in the wrong movie ...

me goose bumps ran down my spine, as the room began to applaud - I felt in a documentary video moved that the hearing people shows in front of a rushing and insane dictator. Maybe you know this feeling of historical documentaries that the incredible euphoria and consent, which did not receive such dangerous people may take ... Even worse is when you really in the middle and you can see no saving anchor, not a spark of questioning or doubt in the audience cheering. At that time I was angry, frustrated disappointed, shocked ...

Shortly after her speech, she vanished from the stage and was not adopted by thanking a local politician. And I thought it simply no longer and pulled half despair, half in anger with his hands in the air and called to make to my attention that I wanted to say something, but this was ignored professionally, while 3 security men, our beloved family minister to their dark official car accompanied. At the output of the local television and was waiting for a "what a great and friendly woman" by one of the guests, which is why the frustration gripped me AGAIN and I have given a dissenting vote. However, as I was pretty horrified by this speech and could hardly think clearly, was of course out of anything meaningful - I would have even considered crazy, if I had seen on television) ('m not a skilled politician with meaning nothing can testify). any event, the press mentioned the next day with no word that it was just not exclusively positive reactions ...

I therefore urge everyone who recognizes that we are on a dangerous path are that he give in his circle of awareness of the current events that educate about issues such as data retention, internet lock, electronic health card, etc. and so many critically thinking people active as possible, so we take our concerns into the policy. The many victims who have fought and suffered for a free life, should not have done for nothing!

explanation of the term "Urpils. It is a certain type of beer, a regional brewery, which in the catchment area is very popular. For Saarland is one such pseudonym is not unusual and could express a certain attachment to the same beer (pure speculation).



repeated mantra-like that woman their campaign of lies - disgusting!


Click here for previous articles: ... because they know (not) do what they are!

Wednesday, August 12, 2009

How To Lower A Blackjack Jack

... because they know (not) do what they! The

The end of privacy ...

(The way the police state) is the title of a book by Peter Schaar . Who does not know who is Peter Schaar , was supposed to quickly move his computer from the wall outlet and buried his cell phone somewhere far away. Perhaps I exaggerate a little subtle with my claim and would like to object strongly that we should not prostitute to the communication media.

The Internet censorship is one of the most desirable goals of leaders of every political orientation, as we were recently demonstrated by the law on the reduction of access to child pornography in communication networks . What good is a democracy, the ruling elite in their own people suspected terrorists without exception, pedophiles, left-and right-wing and many more gradations of criminals? A dark Perspective is revealed to those who want the signs of time have known and try to interpret this ...

It would take too long to put together all the puzzle pieces of an effort by the "transparent citizen" and so I leave it like those whose interests I could wake you. I would like to point out alone on a puzzle-particles, can be forged as refined an elaborate conspiracy against the public eye.

The aforementioned law against the fight against child pornography on 18 June 2009 by the grand coalition of CDU / CSU and SPD agreed. Contrary to all the objections of IT and legal experts, a law was passed, which is totally unsuitable for the actual projects to combat child pornography. Facts have been deliberately ignored and an unprecedented campaign of lies you have the people the necessity of this measure quasi intravenously infused into a pattern of thought do-gooders. (The background and facts are found incidentally in other papers within this blog, so I details not again want to run separately, which are not yet documented.)

supported by the media and lobbyists with the most part politically conservative attitudes and linkages in party political values, could the population of almost unlimited the need for a creeping censorship of the Internet to be convinced. The relatively few "rebels", all of which originate from the love shown to be negative "net community", it was thought obvious to ignore. Contrary to all expectations of the political elite, however, sparked a virtual fire that could not be more clear, not least because of this evil abyss Internet, which somehow did not want to be censored.

Man had not expected to be evident in the information technology, contrary to the policy of each sequence can be embarrassing recorded and documented so that we reconstruct almost mathematical precision with many things can. It was thus possible to expose the lies of the campaign, Ursula von der Leyen and shake at least a part of the public awake. (I would like to reiterate at this point to express the brave people of the "online world" as the makers of netzpolitik.org , thank Working Group censorship , Frank Heine and of course all the other combatants against Internet censorship, without which perhaps the situation would be much worse.)

Despite overwhelming online petition could be dissuaded from the plan the government does not censor the Internet by law. It took no evidence against the proven lies and even predicted that a one could be extended as a censorship tool installed system to other areas as child pornography easily have been averted with false activism.

Too bad only that the lobbyists could not wait to try to claim their own desires publicly. Child pornography can now be so demonstrably not fight with the law it passed really, but censorship is thus still possible. But this will require a new legal basis, since the constitutional violation not committed again can be accomplished in such a short time.

Now I lean with my other excesses very much out of the window and am well aware that I have no evidence it own and it could also completely different course, as I speculate ...

The ZugErschwG should actually 1 August 2009 to take effect. The lead Ministry, headed by Dr. Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, however the law for notification to the EU to send, which means that the Zensursula-Posse to 8 was laid in October 2009 on the political ice. Meanwhile, on 27 September is randomly election and detractors now claim that the law under the so-called principle of discontinuity

could no longer be used. Among other things, was the signing of the law by the President to lapse. From the Economic Ministry and the family were opposing statements, but I felt the rather gentle agitation to the failed timely entry into force of the law personally significant. but is otherwise Ursula von der Leyen known to be very vocal and media attention to perceive if they do not get what she wants, so she stayed back suspicious ...

Even if one should assume that would grant Horst Köhler at the Office of the President ZugErschwG , the awful law of course is the Federal Constitutional Court still to come. In the hope that it put an end to the nonsense, I look to the future were it not for this most enduring distrust of such suspended states.

brings me back to Peter Schaar, the Federal Data Protection Commissioner and I wanted to know from him how he assesses his next moves. It was well known in the law in 2 Edition decided that a five-member committee appointed by him, which was to quarterly and randomly check the secret block list of the BKA. Actually, you should assume that 1 August 2009 This task should be clearly defined, because by law it should be possible at any time that this body can check the list at its discretion. This was Reason enough for me to look into this, not least of all that no one has yet been defined, the exact procedure.

following request I sent therefore to the authority of the Supervisor:

Good day,
I have very aggressively pursuing the debate on the recently passed Access aggravation law ... Despite the benefits of these restrictions applied interests me a completely different issue that is not really in the whole of the debate came into play: How should the control be implemented?
I am quite aware that quarterly spot checks should be carried out and if necessary at any time, but this statement can not really satisfactory, except that I have the level of control anyway ridiculous think, if one assumes that each day included an average of 200 new entries in the list
should (as reported by the Federal Family Minister Ursula von der Leyen, whose evidence in this which anyway never really true). Now I have heard that the BKA wanted to work with an Excel spreadsheet as a blocking list, which would forward it daily to the provider. Only after vehement insistence on the part of providers could convince the
authority that this type of data transport, inappropriate and is also uncertain. Now presents itself to me as IT'ler the question of which People in charge of BKA be such a sensitive, security-issue when people do not even consider this a shortcoming in an unencrypted file format and send these controversial data possibly even as a succinct collection
email? It would be desirable to define the form of a secure data transmission. could be encrypted using the VPN tunnel so you accept? Finally, one must also wonder how the controls of the CRL
be carried out? Sends the BKA also the revocation list as an Excel spreadsheet in an email attachment to the privacy advocates? That would, of course, ridiculous. Even if the data protection without notice at the BKA would make representations, they might not ever even know if they have presented the actual list, possibly as an Excel list ...
As for now ensure that the inspectors actually check the real, current lock list? A meaningful answer, I would look forward to.


On 10 , 2009, note the date, reached me this reply:

Dear *,
take it not to, that the "surveillance" of authority was assigned to my block list. The independent expert body to review the revocation list will be appointed by me only, ie the members are chosen by me. This process is still ongoing. be carried out in what way the controls, the Panel will specify. I assume that such information be published in due course
.
For questions regarding the restricted list, please contact the responsible BKA. Surely you have seen from the media that the law currently in the notification is in Brussels. With the entry into force is not expected before October.

Sincerely


It is thus defined long after the actual entry into force of the law still does not know how to perform such an examination wants. Either procedure is required, I ask the committee or Peter Schaar, not with the necessary care to be or was in some (government) parties had known in advance that this law would not be implemented on time. I just can not imagine that Peter Schaar so unprepared for such a topic would be addressed largely haphazard? One had to assume that in fact 1 August 2009, a review of the blacklist would have taken place. Accordingly, would inevitably have to be a clearly defined procedure provides what obviously is not. This leads to the sole conclusion to Peter Schaar holds a responsible Privacy advocates that even in its clear authority before 1 date August was announced in 2009 that this law would not in time to take effect.

This would also explain the current transmission of the key ministries. Somehow, I gain more and more the impression that the ZugErschwG its creators is suddenly no longer so important to present at least in form. Ursula von der Leyen takes their former pet project apparently deliberately out of any campaign event. What more recently appeared as important, namely the apparent combat child pornography, which should be implemented in a rush through a law of media attention, has seemingly lost its urgency? Whether on to Brussels is now the 7th July 2009 sent to notify the legal text of the first version was incorrect and later corrected version of the entry into force of the law on until at least 1 November has delayed, plays a minor role. can be seen clearly in each case that at least a delay of more harmful for the campaign intends to issue was.

The strategy for the CDU / CSU will rise. It has to start the campaign theme (child pornography) taken in order to mobilize votes. First, we had not reckoned with the known reactions that bring side effects as bad polls could, but has applied to Ursula von der Leyen in association with the fight against child pornography phychological quite a clever tactic. That of all the SPD with the approval of the Act, at a time when it was very controversial, the displeasure of the CDU / CSU and drew away to himself, I call sheer stupidity. That just further SPD politician in later on, not only in the dispute about ZugErschwG had gotten wet feet, the CDU / CSU officials have noticed with satisfaction. It may run for the CDU / CSU is not magnificent, as long as the notification process 27 Of September last.

One need not be a clairvoyant, to predict that the CDU / CSU is well formed (most likely) with the FDP in the next legislative period the government. However, I would like to recall the abused children were abused again for a shabby, in my view the election campaign.

Click here for previous articles: explains The Zugangser-Schwesig Act and how Brigitte Zypries the Internet

Friday, August 7, 2009

15carolina Skiff Dealers

Zugangser-Schwesig Act and how the Internet Brigitte Zypries said ..

Somehow, I am somewhat surprised that the straight and just Federal Justice Minister Brigitte Zypries with my provocative demand for gantry seconded watch draw from the reserve was.
The head of the supreme legal authority, but must simply versed in legal matters ...?
the World interview, she surprised me entirely with new knowledge and so I wanted to reassure me:

Blue: I am on secondment watch
Red: Federal Justice Minister Brigitte Zypries on secondment watch


Good day Mrs Zypries,
"world" - interview you made some statements that I would like to explain more because somehow the truth is not really visible.

"Even in my youth was the recording of music from the usual radio, then on tape or cassette. So there is a to believe certain tradition: you allowed to do that "

music recordings to online radio stations on the internet and conventional radio as I know, perfectly legal, now as before, if such is no (commercial) distributed or am I wrong because

The answer was (and I must admit that I do not fully understand)?

As for the recording of music from the (Internet) Radio . you're wrong, that simple fact it is not principle a recording only with the consent of the owner are created because each. Recording is a reproduction of the music piece dar. give just the right holder is entitled. The recording is therefore in principle not allowed. As I stated in the interview you quoted in addition, this prohibition applies at least if you copy the music at home not only for himself. So there is an exception to the ban: The private copying (§ 53 UrhG). A permitted private copying, however, requires not only that the music is recorded only for personal, private use and used. In addition, nothing in the call recording is not copy protection be bypassed and the template that is copied from the can not, obviously illegally manufactured or manifestly unlawful have been made available. Any direct or indirect use of a recording for commercial purposes is of course also inadmissible.

The answer is very comprehensive, but I somehow do not recognize what I misunderstood? When I record a song but in the online radio and it makes no commercial intention, so privately, I act but not illegal? Where is my only flaw?

But there are also the IT technical part of my correspondence with Ms. Zypries:

"You move anonymously, there is no social control."

Also from this I've spent IT'ler a different understanding. Explain to me how the internet anonymously should be on the road? That may be roughly the idea of lay people and something like this practice even in their simplicity, but said that the illegal music file sharing have windy Abmahnanwälte demonstrated clearly that these so-called anonymity not exist, how you present it. So what do you mean by your anonymity on the Internet?

The response of Ms Zypries I have to break down now, however, otherwise it is too opaque: envision

which detailed technical procedures to you, take you to the view that the user is not on the Internet regularly "Anonymous way," I can not judge.

It is now just so that each PC that wants to participate in the Internet, an IP address is replaced. It is designed to determine the person is relatively unimportant whether a dynamic or static IP address was assigned provider side.
This IP address identifies the exact PC that is in communication with the appropriate power and of course the appropriate users in the event it becomes necessary. This could be compared with adequately in such a social security number or the registration plate of a motor vehicle. In relation to the Internet, the provider can thus understand exactly who, when, how long and eventually also had access to find out what content. The latter is recorded by each visited server. Sometimes you can even keep track of the pathways and through retention, this can even understand half a year later. Now this is not my own opinion, but are purely technical facts. A user is not online anonymously , as Mrs Zypries apparently still accepts. It is not too difficult for the provider to cancel this alleged anonymity. Abmahnanwälte on behalf of the music industry earning quite well at this apparent anonymity by providing access to file criminal complaint and request. The call I really do not anonymity ...

it is He (at least compared to government agencies), almost always, especially if he gets, as it is now usually the case, a dynamic IP address assigned. This can only be special technical arrangements, as they are sometimes used by rights holders to identify so-called illegal downloads, or in special circumstances, in particular for education serious crimes are prosecuted to the person using that IP address back.

So if Abmahnanwälte pretty easy to get the personal data of music exchange users, but it is likely to BKA & Co. ( at least compared to government agencies) are not much heavier?
actually says Ms Zypries exactly what I have previously tried to explain. Anonymity ends where the identity can be determined. How would it otherwise be possible, to identify the driver or operator of a motor vehicle, a Penalty Charge Notice? The warden knows the individual offenders, where they caught a little funny note stuck under the wheel Wicher, certainly not all personally?

And that most people see this as not only confirm the criminal content, in addition to many useful and important information distributed over the Internet, but you see yourself as evidenced by your question, too Sun It could also be due to just this anonymity that it is the throbbing of their self-community has not yet even managed in the approach to command at least the most extreme excesses stop criminal activities in the network.

I see it but not so, but expressly noted that many users are subject to the delusion of anonymity, as Mrs Zypries still too.
That woman Zypries of one day in polemics forfeited by the Internet community responsible for the neglect of criminal intrigues makes, I find very sad and run it on their level of knowledge with regard to the Internet anonymity, which may however not be a justification for the failure of the authorities. I quote here would rather not have a famous saying of Dieter Nuhr ...

Oh, by the way Ms Zypries could not name a foreign provider that does not cooperate with respect to child pornography ...

enter the election campaign, the SPD gas gradually after Ulla Schmidt's company car and the approval of the Zugangserschwesiggesetz the survey by Frank Walter Steinmeier and his team of experts look like 2009 is not particularly promising . Let What one could possibly accuse me as a spelling error, in this case, an intended play on words and results from the intellectual excesses of the SPD family expert Manuela Schwesig during interviews in the Passauer Neue Presse .

... Child abuse is one of the worst crimes out there! On the other hand must be taken hard. The perpetrators must be brought - even across borders. We must also act against child pornography on the Internet. Therefore, the SPD advocates to clear relevant sites whenever possible.

So they announced nothing new and could be flying over these statements also approvingly short, they had not then presented their lack of competence but still,

to the question - "The Law on Internet locks on child porn sites is still not in effect threatens it to fail." - seems the campaign against a technically competent opinion to prevail:

The back and forth have to answer two conducted by the Union ministries. For this stalemate I have not the slightest sympathy. It keeps a better child protection!

It does not seem the inadequacies of the access difficulty Law not yet implemented and is proving THUS TO expertise team of Steinmeier sustained a disservice ...
gladly would I have to tell me of Manuela Schwesig the better protection of children using the Zugangserschwesiggesetzes.

Update: Obviously Manuela Schwesig member of the German Child Protection Agency , which published other children's organizations, a joint statement on the internet has (had):
http://www.dksb.de/upload/dksb/ downloads/Gemeinsame_Stellungnahme_26_5_09.pdf
It is clear from this statement that raised the number of organizations behind the blocking schemes of the government.
After I on 10 had practiced August 2009 in an email to all participating children's organizations, criticizing their position and pointed out that now could keep none of the arguments listed for Internet blocking more of the actual facts stand, I received on 11 August 2009, a response from the German Children's Fund with the reference to a revised statement, which clearly differs from the "old" and which is based largely on the actual facts: http://www.dkhw.de/cms/index.php option = com_content & view = article & id = 550: delete-from-child-pornography-the-internet & catid = 85: current-comments & Itemid = 133

The "old" Opinion is still accessible via direct link and will probably hold extra for Manuela Schwesig available or are not all child protection agencies agree on the facts?

... and most importantly for those who do not know the legal vacuum:

him I have found the fabled "legal vacuum". Anyone who follows the signs that are of politics, media and other conventional Internetausdruckern been set up lands, somehow always on the internet. But there he is not even the "legal vacuum", there is all the forbidden, what is in real life anyway prohibited. If someone uses the term "legal vacuum" most often? It is the Members who wish to censor the Internet. And there you have found him, the "legal vacuum". It is called only different in the higher technical language, the "legal vacuum". Immunity sounds much better and not so and browned from the putrid smell of the wicked. "MPs enjoy immunity" so is a phrase that is often used to the situation according to relish performing it. Even diplomats who are usually also the species "politician" category may taste the sweet fruits of immunity. I do not want to explain what immunity the individual is, for I would not rob the reader the pleasure to research this themselves or "ergooglen" to (as we in the Internet community, this puts it). Particularly amused me was the realization that a query "immune" to the phrase gave 16 300 hits. If you look at some of the results more closely, one quickly that the "legal vacuum" would describe the matter quite accurately, it just depends on your perspective. That immunity neither virtual nor bound by physical limits, should be mentioned ...

Click here for previous articles: To the Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and youth

Wednesday, August 5, 2009

34 Weeks Pregnant, Baby Heart Rate At 120

To the Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth

Good day ladies and gentlemen of the Federal Ministry

I invite you to hereby, on your website, the FAQ page to access barriers ( http://www.bmfsfj.de/bmfsfj/ generator / BMFSFJ / child-and youth-, did = 119244.html )
to correct it immediately or to remove false statements. It is a federal authority is not worthy to publicly publish falsehoods and misinformation. It is the citizens can not be expected to be deliberately deceived by such publications. Also, a ministry must correct mistakes. Particularly to the offending passages I highlighted. Red are the excerpts that are published by the BMFSFJ, blue is my reason for referring to and green to the inquiry made by the FDP. Orange are answers to the FDP inquiry, which the government itself even admits that there are shortcomings.

It is highly disingenuous to make such an error-prone document citizens with publicly available. I refrain, links to the research and figures indicate clearly justify my objection. If necessary I can hand them happy, but I am convinced that you already know the best sources.

questions and answers about blocking access to the Internet (Access Blocking)
: show (as of 28 July 2009)
The issue effectively blocking access to Internet pages, the images of the sexual abuse of children, concerns many citizens. The most important questions and answers on this subject can be found in the overview.

How exactly is child pornography is defined and how it has developed the offer on the Internet?
child pornography is the depiction of the sexual abuse of children. In Germany, the dissemination of hardcore pornography is prohibited. According to § 184b StGB dissemination, acquisition and possession of pornographic magazines be that sexual activity by, or from children in approach, punishable by imprisonment up to five years. However increases the distribution of child pornography over the Internet: A significant increase in case numbers can be registered in the police crime statistics 2008 in the dissemination of pornographic writings (articles) (+14.5 percent to 18 264 cases). However, the possession and the delivery of child pornography under § 184b para 2 and 4 of the Criminal Code by 24.1 percent has decreased to 6707 cases. From the investigations we know that individual pages can be downloaded 50,000 times a month.
to the inquiry made by the FDP was the federal government of any substantiated evidence of these allegations . Submit The answer to the question of what lessons the Federal Government in connection with the distribution has on the Internet, was: The federal government has no own scientific discoveries. However, there are studies in other countries ...
The Federal Government relies on the annual report by the Internet Watch Foundation in 2008 and on estimates of domestic law enforcement authorities. The figures, which are considered as well, and even published publicly, include no traceable evidence. It cites a report from the National High Tech Crime Unit in 2004, according to an account validation a recorded turnover of 1.3 million dollars was, which was apparently generated by commercial child pornography websites. A clear indication in this regard can not be provided, are estimates, since a clear separation of child pornography legal pornography and other benefits can not be differentiated. Among other things, to juggle with figures from the Child Victim Identification Program, which is, in general to missing persons, but simply transfers these numbers appropriately to child pornography. The police crime statistics includes not only actual crimes and offenses, a lot of ads and cases that later did not lead to prosecution or even no conviction is subject to. Nevertheless, the complete number of bold material is used, without subtracting the irrelevant cases, which would have reduced the actual number of genuine cases. The currently presented crime statistics is even talk of significantly declining numbers, which is not least due to the fact that the argument relied on crime statistics and extensive raids were included, which distorts the average natural.

The majority of child pornography is now being distributed worldwide on commercial websites, the operator shall monthly millions. The Federal Criminal assumes that world every day about 1,000 sites containing child pornography are active. Photos and videos showing increasing violence against small and tiny children.
to the inquiry made by the FDP, which data base supports the federal government in assessing the commercial market, following response was given:
The federal government has no detailed assessment of the commercial market for child pornography in Germany ...

The Internet currently offers a simple and low-threshold access to child pornography. Many of the perpetrators will find the Started. Then the barriers fall further.
These statements are based on pure speculation ...
The offer in the network continues to increase. 1998 in the U.S. "Child Victim Identification Program of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children", 100,000 "child abusive images" (images of child pornography exploitation) registered, this number is the end of 2008 increased to 15 million.
This nonsense was already puts a few lines before ...

What governs the planned fight against child pornography law, exactly?
This law is the difficulty of Internet access to child pornography through the access provider in Germany. The Federal
created block lists, the child pornography within the meaning of Penal Code § 184 b contain or reference and is updated every day they are available. The principle "Delete before Lock. The Federal Criminal Police Office is only appropriate messages to list, if other measures prove to be unsuccessful. Personal data that arise because of the stop message may not be used for law enforcement purposes. A the Federal Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information appointed panel of experts at any time inspect the block list and check the entries.
If any personal data should be used, how can we reduce the barrier method of procuring child pornography? Internet censorship on the basis of DNA Access Blocking have proven no benefit in the fight against child pornography on the Internet. It is installed with excessively high costs, a temporary screen that can be overcome in just a few seconds of outspoken lay on demand. The cost-benefit ratio is out of proportion.
The application of control by the Supervisor is also not defined transparent. Even if a member of that body would make the effort to completely block list and check daily to do, how can it be ensured that this controller also checks the real, actual active block list and not an outdated or even manipulated replacement document for consideration receives? Are these inspections without prior notice take? Find the checks at the BKA? Commission has taken action to exclude the manipulation of the block list just before the inspection? Those who work in the IT field know what I'm talking about and understands that there are plenty of ways to manipulate and could really only see IT professionals to manipulate the data, if at all. On the

other hand, the law requires all private service providers to the access impediments that allow access to the use of information over a communication network for at least 10 000 participants. It is formulated technology-neutral. The access must be aggravating but at least at the DNA level includes, but also going deeper blocking techniques. This can mean an intervention in the secrecy of telecommunications, so explicitly in this case the possible restriction of fundamental rights by law and the law cited to this end.

Which sites should be blocked by the proposed law against child pornography?
It is only therefore, to make access to child pornography and encourage reporting of illegal content. The access barriers do not affect the individual communication, but serve to prevent the activation of aimed at the general child pornography. The locks block access to known child porn sites - no matter where you're sitting on the world, the content provider. pages that are put online in the power of Germany, are already blocked. Experience in other countries shows that every day tens of thousands of hits to prevent (such as 15000-18000 in Norway). Transferred to Germany that would mean that 300000-450000 page views could be prevented. Closures have been many years with success in Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, the Netherlands, Italy, Switzerland, New Zealand, United Kingdom, South Korea, Canada and Taiwan.
This statement is demonstrably a lie. Even the law enforcement authorities in the Scandinavian countries have confirmed the opposite. In addition, it has been found by analyzing different blocklists that the contents go far beyond mere child pornography and that the proportion of actual child pornography is even the slightest part. Projections can at best give in elections relatively accurate predictions in this appropriately to traffic child pornography use the internet to do is evidence of absolute ignorance of the IT environment. Apart from this, but to "delete prior barriers" be the principle, why is noted here, that would already be pages that are made by Germany from the web, already blocked? The Internet locks but were not yet officially implemented, or should it be possible to fully erase in Germany?

What is a stop message?
When attempting to access sites containing child pornography, the stop message warns the user that his Internet browser tries to make contact to a Web page in connection with the Distribution of child pornography is used. The operation of this stop message made by the respective access providers. The Federal is a standardized design for layout and content of the Stop message is available. This report emphasizes, and also reinforce the social ostracism of abuse and gives the user the opportunity to inform themselves at the Federal Criminal further on the measure. that the system works, shows the many years of experience of other countries that already have access impediments.
As already mentioned, this is a lie ...
What works up, the DNS Access Blocking, as such, with all the known shortcomings. Child pornography, however, limiting it in any way. The published results are based solely on conjecture. Clicking figures provide no evidence of forecasts. Steadily increasing numbers of users as well as automated bot searches of search engine providers, and more increasingly distort the result. Since apparently no personal data are used, one can logically create any statistics that would be meaningful ...
It therefore should not make such statements, a poster campaign would certainly have the same effect is achieved.


What happens at the access barriers to the data of the Internet user?
The blocking technique on DNA-based and requires the diversion of the message does not stop collecting data, which do not occur anyway as part of the technical process in the business of the access provider.
The independent in the stop message redirection to the resulting traffic and usage data can not be used for law enforcement purposes. should be addressed this concern that the measures have difficulty to access impact on Internet use, because of the fear of cost, to be suspended, even accidental access to the restricted sites list an investigation for child pornography. This includes measures to combat child pornography, made on the basis of other evidence not explicitly. The amendment also addressed a concern of the Federal Council.
In other words, this means nothing other than that personal data that is generated by the corresponding call to banned sites find no use for now, but thanks to a half year data retention are available and can be requested if needed after all. Since it can be assumed that actually Pädokriminelle around the Internet anyway locks can therefore only be available traffic data from random surfers. I do not it opens up the wisdom of using this knowledge, the traffic data of these random users use as needed for law enforcement to do. The entire barrier strategy is anyway only from a few random surfers to save the sight of this child pornographic images. What law enforcement purpose can possibly occur at all realistic?

How are the controls available on the restricted list? to increase the transparency of the
list-based method, is appointed to the Federal Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information, an independent panel of experts. In view of the predominantly legal tasks, namely to assess whether they meet the content requirements of § 184 b StGB, the majority of the members the five-member committee have the ability to be a judge. At least once a quarter is based on a relevant number of sampling, a test of whether the records meet on the block list for the connection. If the majority of the board come to the conclusion that this was not the case, the Federal Criminal Police Office to delete the entry in the next update of the list. Why

follows the conclusion of the contract nor a statutory scheme?
The agreement with five major access providers, 75 percent of the market covered. A legal regulation at the federal level in Germany is all active Internet provider necessarily to the same Rules of a consistent barrier to access to undertake. The security guarantees and a cover of over 97 percent of the market, even in the event that occur later new entrants to the German market.
If not, blocking access to the internet censorship? Threaten Chinese relations?
The blocking access to websites containing child pornography does not touch in the Basic Law guaranteed information and freedom of communication : It's not about limiting freedom, but rather sites where widespread abuse and rape of children and the world in a simple way made available, to block . It's about human rights and the dignity of the individual, namely to protect children and to outlaw serious bodily injury. The restriction of access to strafbewehrtem material and the prevention of new crimes do not violate civil liberties.
This fact is to be treated with caution. An eventual decision was to remain subject to the Federal Constitutional Court, so it is unacceptable that the Federal Ministry for Family Affairs the suspicion here denies censorship. Undisputed, however, the possibility of operating by means of the installed barrier technology, censorship. It makes little difference that censorship is not the intention, as in the other countries that already use block lists, have been shown to Internet sites blocked, vorwiesen not related to child pornography. So that access to these Internet content to Internet users were denied. Whether we want to describe as censorship or not, there remains a risk factor that can not be underestimated.

can prevent access barriers among providers, the proliferation of images and videos that document the sexual abuse of children to 100 percent?
Technically savvy Internet users will always find ways to circumvent the locks. is crucial, however, that making access to the great mass of the average internet savvy user is successfully blocked. findings According to the Federal Criminal are 20 percent of users of child pornography offers (n) hard Pädokriminelle, 80 percent against occasional surfers who stumbled, however, by the increasing use of child pornography ever deeper into the scene. Access barriers make the provider of child pornography sensitive, because they earn less money and thus the widespread development of organized Internet crime will be disturbed.
These statements are completely absurd, and sometimes so are all branded as IT'ler Pädokriminelle. Although I consider this rather awkward formulations, should still be the least BMFSSJ seek a clarification. It has been demonstrated that any average internet user can handle in a few seconds with the appropriate procedure for the locks. Estimates of the Federal are just ridiculous and can not be confirmed in practice. The theory of the so-called "Anfixens" is on very shaky legs. There are quite scientific findings that do not share that view. can not over the loss of commercial operators of child pornography web sites will even philosophize, since already the assumption of a mass market can be demonstrated in any way.

A very large majority of the total population aged 16 years, greeted by 91 percent the new Federal Government measures against the dissemination of child pornography on the Internet. Only 6 percent think these measures are not the appropriate way to combat child pornography, 3 percent remain undecided.
Even under the strong internet users the project by a very large majority is welcomed (89 percent). Only 3 percent are under the impression that would be limited by the stop signs on the Internet's fundamental right to freedom of information too much, say 90 percent: I do not think. 7 percent remain undecided.
The survey results were significantly influenced by the type of questions. A survey on the same subject with other Questions led to a completely opposite conclusion. Personally, I believe that this is for manipulation by deliberate concealment of various background information, thereby leading to achieve the desired result. This approach is deeply dishonest and not worthy of a federal authority.

access barriers are not easy to get around by the providers keep changing the addresses?
why are the lists of banned sites, which are used for example in England (an average of 1,500 active current provider) and Scandinavia, dynamically. ie, the revocation list is updated daily. Updating takes only seconds and works worldwide. instead of resigning from the options on the World Wide Web are used every means against the spread of child pornography. That in a country like Norway for years after the introduction of an Internet lock be blocked up to 15,000 attempts to access child pornographic material shows that the technology is durable.
The answer to the question itself is factually incorrect. Of course, the access locks are easy to get around and it also changes the dynamics of a non-defined block lists nothing. One has to do with the other anything. Personally, I would be interested anyway, as in the update seconds world works? An automated creation and modification of the relevant block list would be irresponsible. It requires very responsible work of the BKA staff in the preparation and updating of the blocking list, which also takes the needed time to complete. If you understand the upgrade the balance of the block lists with other countries, this would be expressed here have been very understandable and would also have to do with the question nothing.

Who is liable for it, when it affects the locks also acceptable offers on the Internet?
access providers can now accurately dangerous content block. The examples show from abroad such as Scandinavia. Also can distinguish very well what is pornography and what is not. In the Scandinavian countries have since 2004 no major complaints . Access provider to block only those pages that are encrypted by the Federal Criminal Police Office to constantly updated lists provided. What is locked shall alone determine the Federal . The access provider to set the block only. If they do this properly, the responsibility lies solely with the Federal Criminal Office. The access provider must not fear any compensation.
access provider to block all content however, either did not accurately or ineffective by DNS Access Blocking, collateral damage can not be excluded. Since only the BKA is responsible for creating the list and the list is kept "secret", a falsely affected content providers can hardly tell if his offer is partially inaccessible. Since only foreign bids are blocked, these providers would have access to free German provider to find out that their sites are advised to list. The fact that someone from Germany to the provider indicating the fact, because this gets presented in the call to the site a stop sign sounds rather unlikely. It is therefore not surprising that received no complaints ...
Assuming that the web site of the BMFSFJ would be on the blacklist in Iran, you would notice this? Even if you would find this now anyway, who you would contact you to complain because your offer is indeed from our own point of view perfectly legal?

If the access lock a replacement for the often tedious prosecution of offenders at home and abroad?
It is not an either-or but a both / and. Closures are part of an overall strategy against the sexual abuse of children and its representation on the web. They are designed to Identification of the perpetrators and the closing of child pornography Web sites, not replace, but effectively complement . The Federal and State Criminal Police Offices (LKA) provide excellent work at home - as the success of the excavated child pornography rings. Investigators will continue to work hard to identify the offender in the country and close to the sources abroad. But in half the countries in possession and distribution of child pornography is punishable either not available or is not punished sufficiently rich, in many cases of police resources is not enough. Then will also be used as a building block of the block of pages as a means to the to prevent access and interfere with the criminal business-sensitive.
Either there was insufficient research, reckless handling of information or simply a lie of the Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, for research by IT professionals have shown that deletions of child pornography can be done quite quickly and effectively. Likewise, it is simply not what is being communicated by the BMFSFJ. Again and again, the issue of 95 so-called rogue states, where child pornography was not or poorly tracked. This was refuted impressive and the number could be reduced from 95 to at least 12. Examples such as India and Kazakhstan, which argument in the discussions introduced were put out to be embarrassing faux pas. "Complement
but effective " - assumed I would, by definition, illegal offers spread on the Internet and get a corresponding revocation list, would this work as an early warning system and I would seek to transfer the contents. From an IT perspective favors the introduction of block lists that redirect to stop sites, the response time of the perpetrators. I think the prohibition rather counterproductive.


With so many sources of external involvement, we will not need international agreements and networks?
We already have good functioning networks. In CIRCAMP (COSPOL Internet Related Child Abusive Material Project) 13 European countries organized by the police: Norway, Britain, Denmark, Belgium, France, Finland, Ireland, Italy, Malta, Poland, Sweden, Netherlands and Spain. Norway operates this network active. Germany will join. And eight countries - Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Netherlands, Switzerland, New Zealand, Italy - use the CSAADF (Child Sexual Abuse Anti Distribution Filter) in order to block websites. The lists of pages to be replaced in those countries within seconds. The closure is adapted to the respective national legislation.
The Federal Government relies on these existing networks, and further agreements. It has the III. World Congress Against the Sexual Exploitation of Children in Rio de Janeiro in November 2008 used to advance the issue of international cooperation. do is respect it was an initiative with Germany Statement by 16 European countries set up the blocking lists and introduce or have introduced access blockages.
We also have this issue at the European follow-up conference "Protection from sexual violence against children and adolescents with a focus on new media: Perspectives for Europe" on 30 June 2009 in Berlin continued. A final document of the conference, the undersigned have 16 points to the common fight against sexual violence and exploitation of children and young people agreed on all levels.
© Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth

work Obviously, the international cooperation in relation to the fight against child pornography is not so great as I want to believe. If one claims that deletion abroad is often not possible and therefore would require a lock, you have to put up with questions can, why you do not work out to optimize this international cooperation and would rather flee in unreasonable restrictions applied? As confirmed by the respective consulates, deletion of child pornography in countries such as India and Kazakhstan is no problem what so obviously the BMFSFJ seemed impossible in this form. The BMFSFJ can perform like other states do not outlaw child pornography, and provide adequate server for the dissemination of this disgusting material. Then we can create a new discussion about the meaning and purpose to open this Internet blocking ...

These lines I sent to the Federal Ministry for Family Affairs. Whether one reacts to it, it will recognize whether the FAQ of the BMFSSJ be changed. Personally, I can hardly the Imagine ...





Click here for previous articles: As I stand now, poor fool, and I'm so smart, than I was before!