Had something thought possible? The federal government passed a law that requires no justification fatally. Here is the speech by the change of the Telemedia Act as regards the fight against child pornography. What would at first when in fact all people find a favorable agreement, turns out on closer inspection as gaffe with unforeseeable consequences. Pure activism coupled with calculated populism open entry into the state censorship. What had happened?
Federal Family Minister Ursula von der Leyen has appointed Jeanne d'Arc the German political elite would like to banish and on behalf of all abused children disgusting child pornography images from his abysmal evil web. May Video News Release by Ursula von der Leyen
you give to an elected People's Representative full faith unless it is: Despite the technical shortcomings that represents the used techniques of
DNS Access Blocking
, the arguments of the Minister are first to understand would justify their plans public? Doubt should be allowed and who will in some way critical of arguments questioning, is indeed not the same as a pederast.
The minister talks openly by millions of business and mass market on the Internet.
In the so-called "Little request" of the FDP deputies Christoph Waitz and Hans-Joachim Otto replies the State Secretary Dr. Bernd Pfaffenbach ...
Q17 based on the data base, the federal government in assessing the commercial market for child pornography in Germany?
Answer: The federal government has no detailed assessment of the commercial market for child pornography in Germany.
Similarly, the politician as happy on the success in other countries with the block list, juggle with numbers of alleged access to child pornography and the huge percentage increase in crime in child pornography range:
Question 3: In which countries are the child pornography content on the Internet and where are the servers on which there is child pornography?
Answer: websites with under German law as a child-pornographic content, according to findings of the BKA einzustufeneden almost exclusively on servers abroad provided and there preferably in countries with low level of control, or where no such legislation exists, or the corresponding regulations are not strictly enforced and monitored ...
And where are the servers in practice? This is obviously not white and gives way to a clear answer from spur of the moment ...
But obviously we know that is not in different countries of child pornography criminally prosecuted adequately. Therefore urges the following question:
Question 4: In which countries is child pornography yet not a criminal offense?
Answer: are given by the Federal Government no confirmed knowledge of the purposes of comparative law studies. Some (tentative) conclusions can be drawn ... ...
Question 6: How many servers that are child pornography, are in countries where child pornography is not a criminal offense?
Answer: As shown in the answer to question 4, has the federal government does not have comparative studies on the criminalization of child pornography in other countries. It has therefore no information on server sites in such countries.
The draft amendment is among others to justify the following (which is cited time and again like Mrs von der Leyen):
the police recorded crime statistics for years a constant increase in the ownership, acquisition and dissemination of child pornography (2007: 11 357 cases; to increase by 55% compared with 2006: 7318 cases). When the collateral of child pornography over the Internet from 2006 to 2007, even an increase of 111% was observed (from 2936 to 6206 cases).
Interestingly, just confirmed by Interior Minister Wolfgang Schäuble recently published crime statistics 2008, a contrary development. Also suppresses Dr. von der Leyen in its argument that the above figures relate to all scheduled ads, crime and the prosecution, but was stopped most of the procedures. In addition to these statistics also flow results from a large-scale, unique investigations. The figures put forward by the Minister therefore, are partly unrealistic and sometimes pure speculation.
Considering the success of, for example, the Scandinavian countries with their blocking lists, so spreads themselves from disillusionment. It is spoken by about 1% real child pornography websites blocked, the rest is either not criminal pornography, long since deleted web sites and, unfortunately, a lot of websites with completely different content.
It is surprising why the government still holds to its plans to curb child pornography with a completely absurd resources from the Internet. That the method of DNA Access Blocking can be avoided in any case by most Internet users easily, I should mention at all any more.
I firmly believe that after using all possible constitutional measures the deletion of child pornography on the Internet would be effective enough that the blacklist of the BKA, without writing very small, found on a beer cap space would. Consistent action against child pornography is blocking lists, which can be used as censorship, unnecessary ...
Important links:
direct request to the Federal Family Minister Ursula von der Leyen
(A voting system can accelerate the personal reply from the Minister may ...)
The fake interviews with various members
(public statements of Representatives shall be in the form of an interview commented sarcastically ...)
Click here for previous articles: driver's license, bank accounts and child pornography
0 comments:
Post a Comment