Family Minister Ursula von der Leyen, ridiculed on the net now as Zensursula would like to receive all the concerns impose from experts from business, law and IT its controversial amendment of the Teleservices Act. Internet surfers the opportunity to lock deter access child pornographic content on the WWW can. These so-called stop-plate sites realized technically DNS Blocking Access ( The domain name of the website is not directed to actual corresponding IP address of the Web server, but on another, so that the call of this website is inhibited ) therefore constitute a barrier and also a warning dar. This obstacle is hardly effective as the unlawful entry of a public lawn, which is characterized by an appropriate sign as a restricted zone. The warning, unfortunately, is much more than a sign can be read on the "Beware of Dog!" Who discovered the stop sign on his screen, is at the same time the BKA as a potential pederast in a list. Comparatively could say it was already bitten by the dog while you are still looking at the warning sign. These interactions are treated in the above link to the forum in some detail and chronologically ... In order to obtain a license
for a motor vehicle, you need some money, in principle, the majority, demonstrated sufficient theoretical and practical training sessions and a final exam. In parallel, it takes a lot of bureaucracy, which ensures that the document is "driving" transferred to certain fixed rules in a verifiable database, where authorities gain any time on-demand access. It does eventually "Everything" have his order ...
Who has no checking or savings account with one or more banks? By default, belong to an account and corresponding credit cards and a variety of services. That one can enter into such a relationship not only with a vigorous handshake seems to be completely natural in our society. I could not tell off the cuff, are cast as many signatures on different forms and diversity that is demanded of personal data. It almost borders on a miracle, that is not the hamster or the canary in particular must be mentioned anywhere yet ...
What now has the license or do the bank account of the proposed amendment of the Telemedia Act to better combat child pornography? Comparatively little, but as a comparison, in principle, but a lot.
Although the arguments, child pornography would have been an explosion spread through the Internet, the commercial market for it would be a lucrative business and the WWW would provide the main hub, have been refuted largely are, let's take it anyway, so be it, as described by the lobbyists claim. How can it be because it can be as easy to offer child pornography on a homepage on the Internet? Since only the blocking of Internet Zensursula and only a domain name can block, is obvious to assume that this type of delivery and consumption that means. Everything else is completely unfounded and would require completely different technical measures.
How will we now the happy owner of such a site? Some providers offer the same in the contract for Internet access as an additional service a so-called domain. In Germany, the Denic responsible for assigning and registering a UK domain. The Denic describes itself as a cooperative and its members are companies that manage the respective customer's domains. In most cases, there are so-called providers, private companies, the applicable laws of the State subject in which they are listed as a company. All companies have generally called "Terms". Here I quote from the times of the terms and Denic 3.2:
ensures the customer that the content is not against the law. In addition, the deposit of pornographic, extremist or not opposed to the decency content through the ICO web services allowed. ICO is entitled to the aforementioned content immediately without further notice and delete them. Does a customer or substantially despite warnings against these conditions, ICO is entitled to the contract terminate for good cause.
As you can easily find, there's also the Internet laws are observed and the terms and conditions are drafted accordingly thereafter. It is totally unreasonable in relation to the Internet from outside of the law to talk. Due to the law, it is really surprising that on servers, especially to the homepages according to the Government as much child pornographic material may be stored under conditions that are hidden from the eyes of Internet users surfing needs. Is it not a duty and task that the provider shall ensure that the terms are complied with, since they are also would make even the criminalization? It is therefore not surprising that references to child pornography will be followed up very promptly and efficiently by the providers. Internet censorship are totally unnecessary ...
likes to call the government's argument that access is not on child pornography in countries without effective laws against child pornography would be easy. This argument is ridiculous. Which country in the world would be like to blame this negative image? Such actions by various organizations have found that to be taken outside of Germany, such questions very seriously and to address it. It should be Mention that the majority of child pornography or, if there really are some who are "hosted" on servers that are in countries whose laws apply the necessary sharpness. Instead of whole departments sift through the BKA the Internet for child pornography websites, you can set up virtual stop signs by the respective providers and spends the rest of the time to managing and testing the derived lists, could these people also work specifically that the horrible images will be deleted directly. Putting the focus on the targeted deletion of child pornography on Internet servers, this approach is not as difficult as the government It wants to sell to the voters and people always effective.
Of course, this is child pornography and also of child abuse contained hardly noticeable, so it deals with only a small part of the overall problem. Stupid way (otherwise I can not even express) stigmatized the government that small area of crime against children as a top priority in the fight against global organized "child porn mafia", except in the even exists. Prostitution of children takes place in real life, mostly in countries where the Internet has no meaning for either perpetrator or victim. Child abuse is also behind closed doors in homes in family environment instead of the perpetrators are not interested to draw attention on the Internet for their transgressions. There is no question that there is a pedophile scene, exchanging the corresponding image and video material, but even that barely touches on the WWW. The Internet is mostly used as transport and communication. Internet censorship will be there no solution, we have asked other, more efficient measures that have been shown here and elsewhere so already. Why do the politicians of the Federal Government, led by Federal Minister for Family Affairs Ursula von der Leyen, vehemently so hard on a method that is doomed to failure even before its launch?
Even under the Pretext and the belief that even this small aspect (child pornography on servers in the WWW) of the overall problem "child abuse" is to fight successfully, the method is hardly promising and very efficient.
Looking at an example of the Danish block list, you will find that use most of the domains listed in the top-level domain com . This is awarded by the U.S. company Verisign . VeriSign also runs the same two DNS root servers, so to speak, the top Hirarchiestufe the name resolution on the Internet. Now we've already established that as a U.S. company Verisign is subject to the laws of the United States, which we all know that child pornography is sufficient under law. It is beyond me, but that so many sleazy sites with top-level domain com may be in circulation, but if the legal situation is clarified? Why do some states still have to operate with such block lists?
You should also know that include the domains on the block lists only a fraction of actual child pornography, while the rest is mostly pornography, but it is without children or with extremely young looking actors, a well-intended suggestion. Still other domains have relatively little or nothing to do with pornography, and some exist not even. That says little for the currency and the maintenance of these CRLs will, but at the BKA much work better (?)
Thus, if a contracting authority of top-level domains such as Verisign not clearly complies with the laws of the United States and followed, I have serious doubts the sincerity of the politicians who are advocating to the public for a tough prosecution of child pornography. The web surfer who accidentally gets a stop sign side is put under general suspicion, earning the company, millions of dollars to the award and administration of domain names (including child pornography), are obviously outside the legal system. Here smell something enormous?
climb the ladder a step higher, one comes to the concept ICANN not around. The acronym stands for Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers which means that here determines which IP addresses and domain names which are in circulation. The "foundation" the Commerce Department reports directly to, which means that the U.S. government basically is in charge.
Then there are the former "One Man Show" IANA (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority), a quasi suborganization of ICANN, which delegated the assignment of IP address ranges to various local establishments. Also in this case, the U.S. government has the absolute influence.
one wanted to act effectively against child pornography and useful on the web, as far as the plans of Federal Family Minister Ursula von der Leyen equivalent, would therefore be with the Government of the United States to the right place. You fight child pornography on the Internet at the roots and leaves in the first place, that these domains can arise, the Internet blocking Zensursula seem downright ridiculous. but someone is violating existing laws, these organizations left in the duty to intervene against it. If they do not, they make themselves liable to prosecution. Where your there are difficulties, transnational combat child pornography, one need but in 99% of cases only in the political, economic and military partner to contact or United States relations are on a humanitarian level, much worse?
What do you do now with the percentage of domains that you can not directly lay with existing laws lame? All right to the BKA these domains rely on a restricted list so that you can not reach them, but please, with no stop sign, data collection! This one would not anyway, but this task should not only be taken by the BKA and sovereign. Apart from the blacklist would rather clearly would fail and ultimately unnecessary. Has been adduced sufficient evidence that the Internet and why locks are useless, at least if one wants to aim only to combat child pornography. It would be about time that the proponents of blocking plans to present themselves sound facts. I call on the supporters of stop signs campaign to prove the following:
Present your once a single Internet presence with a proven child pornography, which can not be removed from the web and only DNS Access Blocking left as appropriate countermeasure is!
I'm waiting ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment