Federal Family Minister Ursula von der Leyen, as well, the younger among us better than Zensursula known, has become a can interview Departure:
http://netzpolitik.org/2009/frau-von-der-leyen-kommentieren/ # comment-322 119
That it acts with relative equanimity, is due to the fact that their goal , called the access difficulty law despite criticism from experts on the way has brought. What remains is a brazen arrogance towards the Internet blocking opponents ...
I grab the interview partially again (thanks netzpolitik.org Scan Lines on) in written form and turn me on as a commentator:
Green: Interviewer
Red: Zensursula
Blue: my comment
child porn sites are blocked, those who try to visit them, see a stop sign. What do you hope to gain?
This is essential as a preventive step. The Internet as it were rolled out the red carpet in Germany by anyone for these images is available, they can click and by dealing with the images and the mass of images that you get, then rises in the course of the years the need to have more of them, so it heats up the market and we know unfortunately from (breathes heavy) statistics, that these men will one day look in real life, the children.
prevention means to want to protect something proactive! If one understands by pedophiles and other Pädokriminelle, it has achieved it. It suggests a mass market of pedophilia, but they can prove in any way. Its allegations are based on their own Estimates and assumptions of others, but not on sound studies. She even speculates that pedophile needs could be increased and this refers not only just people who have these tendencies. They generalize in any way.
I've never accidentally stumbled across child porn on the net. I think that drive these pages you have already consciously aware of these sites and if someone drives, you do not believe that he will also be informed on how the network can just bypass your lock?
Spiegel Online has once made a very interesting study by asked its online readers: "Who is ever accidentally stumbled on such a page?" There was the 8.5 per cent. If you extrapolate that to the Internet, are the 2.5 million with 40 million Internet users. That is, they can say, well, 40 million 2.5 million is a small number, but 2.5 million is a figure that also shows that the mass distribution of the images so for a reason takes place, namely potential to attract customers slowly but surely. And these stop signs make it clear "stop" for those who are clueless as to the look and do not really want. There is also a clear indication of why the site is blocked.
polemics and activism are the weapons of a politician who floats in the argument manure. "So a page " should it be clearly defined, and that this survey is not representative and it has no scientific basis, playing for Zensursula of it in their argument is irrelevant. Interestingly, as a spokesman for the Ministry for the Family exact science on such a basis, as a diligent IT professional for 95 alleged rogue states took a close look that would have to findings of the Family Ministry no laws against child pornography. "The facts and data are very interesting but not scientific background" you replied to research by Dirk Landau, who had the 95 rogue shrink to at least 12.
on the senses proper operation of the unspeakable stop signs to address one more time forbids me (hopefully) the intellect of the local readers. Trade-oriented explanations can be found both in this weblog and virtually anywhere on the Internet, only for members of the ruling coalition this information seems practically inaccessible (or censored) to be?
But if one is willing to go beyond this limit, then you can just go ahead?
This is precisely the point. Who then is willing to cross the border, which is then perfectly clear by now, it is the criminal activity that you're using, now you're making yourself liable to prosecution.
This is the person who wants to look at child pornography, even before clear and already wasted no time trying to look at virtual stop signs. The innocent web surfer who accidentally a stop sign in the browser of his computer discovered, would in any case not the intention of visiting such a website. Where contact can recognize this as a logic, except that the latter is recognized data link, while the criminal energy of and pedophilic tendency driven man, remains unchallenged?
But again the question: Do you think it possible that are blocked in the future, other pages may also contain illegal content?
This is absolutely not my interest and that is the debate that will be implemented in law States. Here, nothing can, so to speak (laughs) be made gradually, but they need more and regulatory proceedings. If someone gets behind such a topic, then he or she will need to discuss this and go, these laws need to process, but this hypothetical discussion, one can only I think, lead to the point where such things, in fact, also the subject of a Gesetzesintitiative or a movement. My concern is that the images of children being raped in the (predominantly) Mass production is disrupted.
It's probably actually not the interests of the family minister, the barriers extend to other content. But just this expression of interest does not exclude that it could happen anyway. On the one hand, exactly these mishaps occurred in other countries to a considerable extent and on the other hand, already have several lobbyists desires expressed openly. The infrastructure is given and can be used at any time very easily. Since there is virtually no control, except that one feels a regular quarterly random CRL checking to be sufficient, it can reasonably express concern.
Now it is, however, that these images are actually not primarily distributed via the Internet, but via the post.
course, which also shipped by post, but the (predominantly) wide entrance is the Internet. We see that are, for example in Sweden with 9 million people a day around 50,000 hits since on these pages. When they extrapolated the to Germany are the most between 350000-400000 requests day. So the play down that this would not be the entry in the child pornography from these massive images, a day set 200 new pictures online. I think that's cynical.
It's unbelievable, but Mrs. von der Leyen is not tired, long since refuted specious arguments and figures put forward. I confess all to make mistakes and to represent false opinions, but if they have been refuted several times and corrected, we should not further pursue this line of reasoning. This is profoundly dishonest ...
I think that's cynical. This is profoundly dishonest!
Mrs. von der Leyen has disqualified himself as a people's representative, as are the members who have shared the responsibility to improve the knowledge and against their conscience for the adoption of the access difficulty Law.
Even Martina Krogmann, parliamentary spokesperson for the CDU / CSU has also made it deems necessary to defend in an interview that junk ZugErschwG :
We are concerned with the pornographic content in countries where child pornography is not just
outlawed and punished is not consistently
and will therefore not be deleted. [...] Because we do for things that are
on a server such as Kazakhstan, as we have no access
it.
Kazakhstan know most, if ever, get from the movie Borat and hardly anyone is the legal texts of this country "from the hip" can. It does not matter because Jörg-Olaf Schäfers of netzpolitik.org had undertaken this work. To the testimony of Mrs. Krogmann not to leave undocumented, he contacted Adilbek Alzhanov , the Messenger the Kazakh Embassy in Berlin, and asked how the regulations regarding child pornography look in Kazakhstan. In reply he was informed that of course is illegal child pornography and in Kazakhstan. Mr. Alzhanov translated the relevant legal texts and sent them on how Netzpolitik.org is read.
Source: http://www.heise.de/tp/r4/artikel/30/30674/1.html
justify wife Krogmann thus aggravating the access law based on the impossibility of being able to delete child pornography abroad, the example of a so-called rogue state (Kazakhstan). Demonstrably shows, however, the Government of Kazakhstan ready to fight child pornography and has also anchored against the misinformation of our Federal Government in the law. What is your privacy again there is the need of blocking child pornography on a server in Kazakhstan? Apart from that not a single entry of a child pornography is offered in the restricted lists of countries that use them, which leads to Kazakhstan ...
Ironically, however, is on the lists of offers, the bob on the servers and to the law enforcement agencies not been looked after. As will be the slogan of Familienminsteriums is the overall concept in the fight against child pornography: locks before deleting (The proof of the way, may not be provided, as has been paid to turn a criminal offense!)
From 1 August 2009, the law and thus legitimized the violation of the Constitution in force. I am well aware that it will decide the federal constitutional court and I'm just a little not knowing sausages in a constitutional lawyer soup. It was good, it still does not, and this freedom I take me out for as long as it will be allowed by the censors of the BKA. Certainly I run the risk that this blog could be censored, because there appear several times on concepts such as child pornography, pedophilia and pederast. Now might be thinking right that Ian Clarke is yet, but the foreign CRL prove the possibility of possibility. Recently, someone has even said that he would since the vehement debate on the issue of child pornography; the same word and therefore not related to use as search terms on Google, because he was afraid of falling into this grid search ...
Click here for previous articles: stupid people are good voters
0 comments:
Post a Comment