is undisputed that the so-called bird flu a not to be underestimated infectious disease, and any concern is well founded, now it has also been human deaths. Nevertheless, I consider the actions of the authorities is excessive, or at least questionable. I would also like, in my view, that a pandemic laity and non-keeper, justify, so I was not nachsagt superficial talk. First I would like to reiterate that I am by no means the danger of the H5N1 - play down pathogen wants. I DIMENSIONS me not to want to appear in this matter as an expert, but questioning only basic activities. For an interesting word creature I think the term "bird flu-limits area " that circulates through the media and indeed in some areas has become a de facto agent. Under "forbidden area" is understood commonly a limited area, which will be sealed off by more or less effective means. This could mean that no one is in or out to just anyone. The latter is also known as a quarantine. Hello! it is the authorities might have missed that potential virus carriers Birds, of which one or the other can even fly? You can not seriously imagine that follow Wild Duck, Wren and Co., the road traffic regulations or signs indicate accordingly! Since the first cat is infected with the bird flu virus, the calls by the authorities to be loud, to shoot free-ranging cats. Are we already in the Wild West? May soon be geballert on everything that moves in a suspicious and possibly had contact with infected poultry had? That sounds plausible, since even healthy animals as a precaution "culled" to be here ...... but being exposed to my understanding of something. There are virtually killed for prophylaxis of potentially endangered animals although they are not ill, however, to prevent a further spread of the disease? Similarly, you could just escape to all motorists, driving a precaution, since they could provoke a traffic accident in the near future! Perhaps we should give the authorities time the tip that you should also dispose of all precaution foxes, martens, hedgehogs and other animals that come out as a meat eater, as a precaution ... It is not logical for me to understand why just now as a cat target for the birds to the attention of policy advised to find but are typical representatives of the food chain above the birds no attention?! somehow affects me feel to suggest that because outworked any aspects of activities, at least to demonstrate responsiveness, although not in the right direction. One shows overzealous presence and drive to anticipate a political justification, that you would not possibly respond timely to the situation. It appears to play a subordinate role, which measures really make sense now, the main thing you must never inaction accuse lassen.Übrigens avian flu is just right, unpopular decisions in other areas through a highly effective campaign called "bird flu" to move to the sidelines . OK - I admit, that this as a polemic would cost, but in my own weblog I may use an element of subjectivity ... Here's an interesting link about: more ...
Avian Flu (go go ...) No sooner is an
found with bird flu sick or dead bird is widely established a restricted zone around it. Does not that sound paradoxical, when you talk about birds? Initially, the first cases were in plentiful numbers on the island of Ruegen, then a case of Lake Constance and, finally, on the Rhine at Mannheim. Geographically, it has thus an axis from north to south. Referring to the fact one that the sites but relatively clear Areas were and are frequented by many people, it seems likely that most will be all the other German regions potential closed areas. Why then these individual measures, if we could appoint quasi with fairly high certainty the Republika this? ... And what's up with swine fever and mad cow disease? It's not as if the diseases were replaced by bird flu - the hot spots are still continue, or have I missed something? Avian Flu
(continued) ...
As you would have noticed, this report is not from a single block, which was completed at a given time. It is viellmehr so that this report extended almost through the updating of the media reports.
Now when other animals were found that were infected with the bird flu virus (stone marten on complaints), and the authorities had to accept that not only birds and cats can be affected. False reports of infected animals (breeding ducks in Bavaria) can give the impression as if the avian influenza is currently the only possible and acceptable mode of death in animals. Is not that presumptuous? And now the politicians what they can anyway best, award each other misconduct and incompetence. On one side says Federal Agriculture Minister Horst Seehofer of early information policy and on the other end presses Werner Schnappauf (Head of the Ministry of Environment, Health & Consumer Protection in Bavaria), his lack of understanding about the fact that there are at Seehofer either verspätetetes (complaints) or just premature behavior in terms of crisis management.
As you can see, it is apparently more important to focus on political power banter in the foreground as the attention paid to the actual problem. That in turn more than 400 animals "precautionary" were killed, is apparently not worth mentioning. I would much more interesting to see the statements of the affected farmers and, incidentally, I assume that in the latter case also determined the stable duty has been complied with ...
is particularly paradoxical, the fact that according to the EU decision, the eggs from hens housed, which are normally kept as free-range poultry, and also as free-range eggs may be declared? There
Interesting comments about bird flu, among other things here: http://www.oberthal-online.de/keulung.swf
Greetz!
TB
0 comments:
Post a Comment